The Works of Thomas Hood; Vol. 02 (of 11): Comic and Serious, in Prose and Verse, With All the Original IllustrationsHood, Thomas
General
The Works of Thomas Hood; Vol. 02 (of 11): Comic and Serious, in Prose and Verse, With All the Original Illustrations
Hood, Thomas
English poetry -- 19th century; English wit and humor; Humorous poetry, English
To judge by my zeal and delight in my new pursuit, the bowl had at
last found its natural bias[6]. Not content with taking articles,
like candidates for holy orders--with rejecting articles like the
Belgians--I dreamt articles, thought articles, wrote articles, which
were all inserted by the editor, of course, with the concurrence of his
deputy. The more irksome parts of authorship, such as the correction
of the press, were to me labours of love. I received a revise from Mr.
Baldwin’s Mr. Parker, as if it had been a proof of his regard; forgave
him all his slips, and really thought that printers’ devils were not
so black as they are painted. But my top-gallant glory was in “our
Contributors!” How I used to look forward to Elia! and backward for
Hazlitt, and all round for Edward Herbert, and how I used to _look
up_ to Allan Cunningham! for at that time the London had a goodly
list of writers--a rare company. It is now defunct, and perhaps no
ex-periodical might so appropriately be apostrophized with the Irish
funereal question--“Arrah, honey, why did you die?” Had you not an
editor, and elegant prose writers, and beautiful poets, and broths
of boys for criticism and classics, and wits and humorists.--Elia,
Cary, Procter, Cunningham, Bowring, Barton, Hazlitt, Elton, Hartley
Coleridge, Talfourd, Soane, Horace Smith, Reynolds, Poole, Clare, and
Thomas Benyon, with a power besides. Hadn’t you Lions’ Heads with
Traditional Tales? Hadn’t you an Opium Eater, and a Dwarf, and a Giant,
and a Learned Lamb, and a Green Man? Had not you a regular Drama, and
a Musical Report, and a Report of Agriculture, and an Obituary, and
a Price Current, and a current price, of only half-a-crown? Arrah,
why did you die? Why, somehow the contributors fell away--the concern
went into other hands--worst of all, a new editor tried to put the
Belles Lettres in Utilitarian envelopes; whereupon, the circulation
of the Miscellany, like that of poor Le Fevre, got slower, slower,
slower,--and slower still--and then stopped for ever! It was a sorry
scattering of those old Londoners! Some went out of the country: one
(Clare) went into it. Lamb retreated to Colebrooke. Mr. Cary presented
himself to the British Museum. Reynolds and Barry took to engrossing
when they should pen a stanza, and Thomas Benyon gave up literature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account