It is a remarkable circumstance that conditions of equable and warm
climate, combined with humidity, do not seem to have been limited to any
one part of the globe, but the temperature of the whole globe seems to
have been nearly the same in very different latitudes. From the
Equatorial regions up to Melville Island, in the Arctic Ocean, where in
our days eternal frost prevails--from Spitzbergen to the centre of
Africa, the carboniferous flora is identically the same. When nearly the
same plants are found in Greenland and Guinea; when the same species,
now extinct, are met with of equal development at the equator as at the
pole, we cannot but admit that at this epoch the temperature of the
globe was nearly alike everywhere. What we now call _climate_ was
unknown in these geological times. There seems to have been then only
one climate over the whole globe. It was at a subsequent period, that
is, in later Tertiary times, that the cold began to make itself felt at
the terrestrial poles. Whence, then, proceeded this general superficial
warmth, which we now regard with so much surprise? It was a consequence
of the greater or nearer influence of the interior heat of the globe.
The earth was still so hot in itself, that the heat which reached it
from the sun may have been inappreciable.
Another hypothesis, which has been advanced with much less certainty
than the preceding, relates to the chemical composition of the air
during the Carboniferous period. Seeing the enormous mass of vegetation
which then covered the globe, and extended from one pole to the other;
considering, also, the great proportion of carbon and hydrogen which
exists in the bituminous matter of coal, it has been thought, and not
without reason, that the atmosphere of the period might be richer in
carbonic acid than the atmosphere of the present day. It has even been
thought that the small number of (especially air-breathing) animals,
which then lived, might be accounted for by the presence of a greater
proportion of carbonic acid gas in the atmosphere than is the case in
our own times. This, however, is pure assumption, totally deficient in
proof. Nothing proves that the atmosphere of the period in question was
richer in carbonic acid than is the case now. Since we are only able,
then, to offer vague conjectures on this subject, we cannot profess with
any confidence to entertain the opinion that the atmospheric air of the
Carboniferous period contained more carbonic acid gas than that which we
now breathe. What we can remark, with certainty, as a striking
characteristic of the vegetation of the globe during this phase of its
history, was the prodigious development which it assumed. The Ferns,
which in our days and in our climate, are most commonly only small
perennial plants, in the Carboniferous age sometimes presented
themselves under lofty and even magnificent forms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account