The strange structure of this animal gave rise to most contradictory
opinions from the earlier naturalists. One supposed it to be a bird,
another a bat, and others a flying reptile. Cuvier was the first to
detect the truth, and to prove, from its organisation, that the animal
was a Saurian. “Behold,” he says, “an animal which in its osteology,
from its teeth to the end of its claws, presents all the characters of
the Saurians; nor can we doubt that their characteristics existed in its
integuments and softer parts, in its scales, its circulation, its
generative organs: it was at the same time provided with the means of
flight; but when stationary it could not have made much use of its
anterior extremities, even if it did not keep them always folded as
birds fold their wings. It might, it is true, use its small anterior
fingers to suspend itself from the branches of trees; but when at rest
it must have been generally on its hind feet, like the birds again, and
like them it must have carried its neck half-erect and curved backwards,
so that its enormous head should not disturb its equilibrium.” This
diversity of opinion need not very much surprise us after all, for, with
the body and tail of an ordinary mammal, it had the form of a bird in
its head and the length of its neck, of the bat in the structure and
proportion of its wings, and of a reptile in the smallness of its head
and in its beak, armed with at least sixty equal sharp-pointed teeth,
differing little in form and size.
Dr. Buckland describes eight distinct species, varying in size from a
snipe to a cormorant. Of these, _P. crassirostris_ (Fig. 105) and _P.
brevirostris_ (Fig. 106), were both discovered in the Lias of
Solenhofen. _P. macronyx_ belongs to the Lias of Lyme Regis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account