From its kind of life, and its frugal regimen, this Pachyderm scarcely
merited the formidable name of Dinotherium which has been bestowed on it
by naturalists (from δεινος, _terrible_, θηριον, _animal_). Its size
was, no doubt, frightful enough, but its habits seem to have been
peaceful. It is supposed to have inhabited fresh-water lakes, or the
mouths of great rivers and the marshes bordering their banks by
preference. Herbivorous, like the Elephant, it employed its proboscis
probably in seizing the plants which hung suspended over the waters, or
floated on their surface. We know that the elephants are very partial to
the roots of herbaceous plants which grow in flooded plains. The
Dinotherium appears to have been organised to satisfy the same tastes.
With the powerful natural mattock which Nature had supplied him for
penetrating the soil, he would be able to tear from the bed of the
river, or lake, feculent roots like those of the Nymphæa, or even much
harder ones, for which the mode of articulation of the jaws, and the
powerful muscles intended to move them, as well as the large surface of
the teeth, so well calculated for grinding, were evidently intended
(Fig. 160).
* * * * *
The _Mastodon_ was, to all appearance, very nearly of the size and form
of our Elephant--his body, however, being somewhat longer, while his
limbs, on the contrary, were a little thicker. He had tusks, and very
probably a trunk, and is chiefly distinguished from the existing
Elephant by the form of his molar teeth, which form the most distinctive
character in his organisation. These teeth are nearly rectangular, and
present on the surface of their crown great conical tuberosities, with
rounded points disposed in pairs to the number of four or five,
according to the species. Their form is very distinct, and may be easily
recognised. They do not bear any resemblance to those of the carnivora,
but are like those of herbivorous animals, and particularly those of the
Hippopotamus. The molar teeth are at first sharp and pointed, but when
the conical points are ground down by mastication, they assume the
appearance presented in Fig. 161. When, from continued grinding, the
conical teat-like points are more deeply worn, they begin to assume the
appearance shown in Fig. 160. In Fig. 162 we represent the head and
lower jaw of the Miocene Mastodon; from which it will appear that the
animal had two projecting tusks in the lower jaw, corresponding with two
of much larger dimensions which projected from the upper jaw.
[Illustration: Fig. 161.--Molar teeth of Mastodon, worn.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account