Mazuyer showed the skeleton of the pretended Teutobocchus in all the
cities of France and Germany, and also to Louis XIII., who took great
interest in contemplating this marvel. It gave rise to a long
controversy, or rather an interminable dispute, in which the anatomist
Riolan distinguished himself--arguing against Habicot, a physician,
whose name is all but forgotten. Riolan attempted to prove that the
bones of the pretended king were those of an Elephant. Numerous
pamphlets were exchanged by the two adversaries, in support of their
respective opinions. We learn also from Gassendi, that a Jesuit of
Tournon, named Jacques Tissot, was the author of the notice published by
Mazuyer. Gassendi also proves that the pretended medals of Marius were
forgeries, on the ground that they bore Gothic characters. It seems very
strange that these bones, which are still preserved in the cases of the
Museum of Natural History in Paris, where anybody may see them, should
ever have been mistaken, for a single moment, for human remains. The
skeleton of Teutobocchus remained at Bordeaux till 1832, when it was
sent to the Museum of Natural History in Paris, where M. de Blainville
declared that it belonged to a Mastodon.
[Illustration: Fig. 166.--Skeleton of Mesopithecus.]
[Illustration: Fig. 167.--Mesopithecus restored. One-fifth natural
size.]
The Apes made their appearance at this period. In the ossiferous beds
of Sansan M. Lartet discovered the _Dryopithecus_, as well as _Pithecus
antiquus_, but only in imperfect fragments. M. Albert Gaudry was more
fortunate: in the Miocene rocks of Pikermi, in Greece, he discovered the
entire skeleton of _Mesopithecus_, which we present here (Fig. 166),
together with the same animal restored (Fig. 167). In its general
organisation it resembles the dog-faced baboon or ape, a piece of
information which has guided the artist in the restoration of the
animal.
* * * * *
The seas of the Miocene period were inhabited by great numbers of beings
altogether unknown in earlier formations; we may mention no less than
ninety marine genera which appear here for the first time, and some of
which have lived down to our epoch. Among these, the molluscous
Gasteropods, such as _Conus_, _Turbinella_, _Ranella_, _Murex_ (Fig.
169), and _Dolium_ are the most abundant; with many Lamellibranchiata.
[Illustration: Fig. 168.--Cerithium plicatum.]
[Illustration: Fig. 169.--Murex Turonensis.]
[Illustration: Fig. 170.--Ostrea longirostris. One quarter natural size.
Living form.]
The Foraminifera are also represented by new genera, among which are the
Bolivina, Polystomella, and Dentritina.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account