Numerous discoveries like those we have quoted distinguished the 18th
century; but the progress of science has now rendered such mistakes as
we have had to relate impossible. These bones were at length universally
recognised as belonging to an Elephant, but erudition now intervened,
and helped to obscure a subject which was otherwise perfectly clear.
Some learned pedant declared that the bones found in Italy and France
were the remains of the Elephants which Hannibal brought from Carthage
with the army in his expedition against the Romans. The part of France
where the most ancient bones of these Elephants were found is in the
environs of the Rhône, and consequently on the route of the Carthaginian
general, and this consideration appeared to these terrible savants to be
a particularly triumphant answer to the naturalist’s reasoning. Again,
at a later period, Domitius Ænobarbus conducted the Carthaginian armies,
which were followed by a number of Elephants, armed for war. Cuvier
scarcely took the trouble to refute this insignificant objection. It is
merely necessary to read, in his learned dissertation, of the number of
elephants which could remain to Hannibal when he had entered Gaul.
But the best reply that can be made to this strange objection raised by
the learned, is to show how extensively these fossil bones of Elephants
are scattered, not in Europe only, but over the world--there are few
regions of the globe in which their remains are not found. In the north
of Europe, in Scandinavia, in Ireland, in Belgium, in Germany, in
Central Europe, in Poland, in Middle Russia, in South Russia, in Greece,
in Italy, in Africa, in Asia, and, as we have seen, in England. In the
New World remains of the Mammoth are also met with. What is most
singular is that these remains exist more especially in great numbers in
the north of Europe, in the frozen regions of Siberia--regions
altogether uninhabitable for the Elephant in our days. “There is not,”
says Pallas, “in all Asiatic Russia, from the Don to the extremity of
the promontory of Tchutchis, a stream or river, especially of those
which flow in the plains, on the banks of which some bones of Elephants
and other animals foreign to the climate have not been found. But in the
more elevated regions, the primitive and schistose chains, they are
wanting, as are marine petrifactions. But in the lower slopes and in the
great muddy and sandy plains, above all, in places which are swept by
rivers and brooks, they are always found, which proves that we should
not the less find them throughout the whole extent of the country if we
had the same means of searching for them.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account