The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)Churchill, Winston
History
The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)
Churchill, Winston
World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Great Britain
Suppose again that now after the Austrian ultimatum to Serbia, the
Foreign Secretary had proposed to the Cabinet that if matters were so
handled that Germany attacked France or violated Belgian territory,
Great Britain would declare war upon her. Would the Cabinet have
assented to such a communication? I cannot believe it. If Sir Edward
Grey could have said on Monday that if Germany attacked France or
Belgium, England would declare war upon her, might there not still have
been time to ward off the catastrophe? The question is certainly
arguable. But the knowledge which we now have of events in Berlin tends
to show that even then the German Government were too deeply committed
by their previous action. They had before their eyes the deliberate
British announcement that the Fleet was being held together. That at
least was a serious if silent warning. Under its impression the German
Emperor, as soon as he returned to Berlin, made on this same Monday and
succeeding days strong efforts to bring Austria to reason and so to
prevent war. But he could never overtake events or withstand the
contagion of ideas. However this may be, I am certain that if Sir Edward
Grey had sent the kind of ultimatum suggested, the Cabinet would have
broken up, and it is also my belief that up till Wednesday or Thursday
at least, the House of Commons would have repudiated his action. Nothing
less than the deeds of Germany would have converted the British nation
to war. To act in advance of those deeds would have led to an exposure
of division worse than the guarded attitude which we maintained, which
brought our country into the war united. After Wednesday or Thursday it
was too late. By the time we could speak decisive words of warning, the
hour of words had certainly passed for ever.
It is true to say that our Entente with France and the military and
naval conversations that had taken place since 1906, had led us into a
position where we had the obligations of an alliance without its
advantages. An open alliance, if it could have been peacefully brought
about at an earlier date, would have exercised a deterring effect upon
the German mind, or at the least would have altered their military
calculations. Whereas now we were morally bound to come to the aid of
France and it was our interest to do so, and yet the fact that we should
come in appeared so uncertain that it did not weigh as it should have
done with the Germans. Moreover, as things were, if France had been in
an aggressive mood, we should not have had the unquestioned right of an
ally to influence her action in a pacific sense: and if as the result of
her aggressive mood war had broken out and we had stood aside, we should
have been accused of deserting her, and in any case would have been
ourselves grievously endangered by her defeat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account