The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)Churchill, Winston
History
The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)
Churchill, Winston
World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Great Britain
They should entrench themselves conveniently along or near their
frontier, constructing a vast system of field fortifications, open and
concealed, sham and real, according to every device known at that time;
and in these positions they should await the first shock of the Germans.
I believed that the Germans did not appreciate the tremendous power of
modern weapons, particularly the rifle. I based this on what I had seen
of their methods in their manœuvres of 1906 and 1909 and on what I had
learned about rifle fire in the South African War. The Germans were the
challengers; they were the stronger, but not, in my opinion, strong
enough for the continuous storming and reduction of well-fortified
positions held by French regular armies or by British troops. I did not,
of course, contemplate that the French would dig one uniform line along
the whole length of their frontier. They would naturally treat the
problem selectively, here resisting with their utmost strength, there
allowing the enemy to penetrate and bulge into unpromising country or
into some well-considered tactical area only to be brought up by lines
fifteen to twenty miles in rear. They would not hesitate to sell the
Germans piece by piece a certain amount of ground for disproportionate
losses. The universal tactical object to be pursued in this first phase
should be to force the Germans to expose themselves in the open to the
rifle and artillery fire of well-trained Frenchmen.
It would be reasonable to hope that a process of this kind, continued
for three or four days along the whole front, would have resulted in far
heavier losses to the Germans than to the French, and that a larger
proportion of the German than of the French armies would have been
deployed and extended. One hoped in this way to see the French take toll
of the manhood of the German nation at the outset of the war, as the
British Army did on a small scale at Mons and Le Cateau. This would in
no way have excluded tactical action by means of counter-attacks
wherever opportunities presented themselves. Meanwhile at least
two-fifths of the French armies should have been held back in a great
mass of manœuvre, north-east of Paris. With this mass of manœuvre I
hoped the British Army would have been associated. This general
disposition should not have been compromised by any effort to proceed to
the relief of Belgium, except with cavalry and small detachments to
encourage the Belgians and to gain time. I was, of course, firmly
persuaded, in common with the British General Staff, that the main
German encircling movement would take place through Belgium and would
comprise considerable forces west of the Belgian Meuse. I hoped that if
this movement eventuated and prolonged itself in great strength, the
French would find an opportunity of using the greater part of their
armies of manœuvre against it after the Germans had been well punished
along the whole front. At any rate, that is the sort of way in which I
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account