The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)Churchill, Winston
History
The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)
Churchill, Winston
World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Great Britain
The second phase of the war now opened. The French, having heaved the
Germans back from the Marne to the Aisne, and finding themselves unable
to drive them further by frontal attacks, continually reached out their
left hand in the hopes of outflanking their opponents. The race for the
sea began. The French began to pass their troops from right to left.
Castelnau’s army, marching behind the front from Nancy, crashed into
battle in Picardy, striving to turn the German right, and was itself
outreached on its left. Foch’s army, corps after corps, hurried by road
and rail to prolong the fighting front in Artois; but round the left of
this again lapped the numerous German cavalry divisions of von der
Marwitz—swoop and counter-swoop. On both sides every man and every gun
were hurled as they arrived into the conflict, and the unceasing
cannonade drew ever northwards and westwards—ever towards the sea.
Where would the grappling armies strike blue water? At what point on the
coast? Which would turn the other’s flank? Would it be north or south of
Dunkirk? Or of Gravelines or Calais or Boulogne? Nay, southward still,
was Abbeville even attainable? All was committed to the shock of an
ever-moving battle. But as the highest goal, the one safe inexpugnable
flank for the Allies, the most advanced, the most daring, the most
precious—worth all the rest, guarding all the rest—gleamed Antwerp—could
Antwerp but hold out.
Antwerp was not only the sole stronghold of the Belgian nation: it was
also the true left flank of the Allied front in the west. It guarded the
whole line of the Channel Ports. It threatened the flanks and rear of
the German armies in France. It was the gateway from which a British
army might emerge at any moment upon their sensitive and even vital
communications. No German advance to the sea-coast, upon Ostend, upon
Dunkirk, upon Calais and Boulogne, seemed possible while Antwerp was
unconquered.
My own feeling at the outbreak of the war had been that if the right
things were done, Antwerp ought to hold out for two or even three
months, that is to say, until we knew the result of the main collision
of the armies on all the fronts—French, Russian, Austrian. I rested my
thought on Metz and Paris in 1870–71, Plevna in 1878, Port Arthur in
1904. The fall of Namur unsettled these foundations. Still Antwerp, even
apart from its permanent fortifications, was a place of great strength,
fortified by rivers and inundations, and defended by all that was best
in the Belgian nation and by practically its whole Field Army.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account