The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)Churchill, Winston
History
The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)
Churchill, Winston
World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Great Britain
‘It involves practically a flank position for a line of supply
protected by forces large enough to be hit hard and perfectly
powerless against any determined German attack which it is thought
worth while to deliver. At any moment a punch up from Brussels by a
German division or larger force would rupture the line, and drive the
troops trying to hold it to be disarmed on neutral Dutch territory or
into the sea.’
I dwelt on the disadvantages to the Allies of a neutrality which kept
the Rhine open for Germany and closed the Scheldt to Antwerp.
As these questions are still of some delicacy I have thought it better
to summarise rather than reprint my memorandum. But I draw the reader’s
attention to the date—September 7.
I still think that strong representations to the Dutch Government might
well have induced them to grant this relief to Antwerp and the Belgian
nation in their agony. The original guarantee of Belgian neutrality was
given to the Government of the Netherlands, and it would have been a
natural and legitimate demand that they should put no needless obstacle
in the way of its fulfilment. The sympathies of Holland for the
sufferings of Belgium were naturally restrained by the fear of sharing
her fate. But a neutral Holland was of far more use to Germany than a
hostile, a conquered, or even an allied Holland. Once Holland was
attacked by or allied to Germany we could close the Rhine, and if we
were in alliance with Holland, the Texel and other Dutch islands of
enormous strategic importance would become available for the forward
action of the British Navy. We should in fact have that oversea base
without which a British naval offensive was impossible. I do not
therefore believe that if Holland had agreed to open the Scheldt for the
succour of Antwerp, Germany would have declared war upon her. There
would have been a long argument about interpretations of neutrality in
which the Germans, after their behaviour, would have started at a great
disadvantage. I still think that if Holland could have said to Germany
‘the English are threatening us with a blockade of the Rhine if we do
not open the Scheldt,’ Germany would have accepted the lesser of two
evils.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account