The conditions of dream life, indeed, lend themselves with a peculiar
facility to the formation of symbolism, that is to say, of images
which, while evoked by a definite stimulus, are themselves of a totally
different order from that stimulus. The very fact that we _sleep_, that
is to say, that the avenues of sense which would normally supply the real
image of corresponding order to the stimulus are more or less closed,
renders symbolism inevitable.[146] The direct channels being thus largely
choked, other allied and parallel associations come into play, and since
the control of attention and apperception is diminished, such play is
often unimpeded. Symbolism is the natural and inevitable result of these
conditions.[147]
It might still be asked why we do not in dreams more often recognise the
actual source of the stimuli applied to us. If a dreamer's feet are in
contact with something hot, it might seem more natural that he should
think of the actual hot-water bottle, rather than of an imaginary Etna,
and that, if he hears a singing in his ears, he should argue the presence
of the real bird he has often heard rather than a performance of Haydn's
_Creation_, which he has never heard. Here, however, we have to remember
the tendency to magnification in dream imagery, a tendency which rests
on the emotionality of dreams. Emotion is normally heightened in dreams.
Every impression reaches sleeping consciousness through this emotional
atmosphere, in an enlarged form, vaguer it may be, but more massive. The
sleeping brain is thus not dealing with actual impressions--if we are
justified in speaking of the impressions of waking life as 'actual'--even
when actual impressions are being made upon it, but with transformed
impressions. The problem before it is to find an adequate cause, not for
the actual impression, but for the transformed and enlarged impression.
Under these circumstances symbolism is quite inevitable. Even when the
nature of an excitation is rightly perceived its quality cannot be
rightly perceived. The dreamer may be able to perceive that he is being
bitten, but the massive and profound impression of a bite which reaches
his dreaming consciousness would not be adequately accounted for by
the supposition of the real mosquito that is the cause of it; the only
adequate explanation of the transformed impression received is to be found
(as in a dream already narrated) in a creature as large as a lobster.
This creature is the symbol of the real mosquito.[148] We have the same
phenomenon under somewhat similar conditions in the intoxication of
chloroform and nitrous oxide.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account