The World's Earliest Music: Traced to Its Beginnings in Ancient Lands by Collected Evidence of Relics, Records, History, and Musical Instruments from Greece, Etruria, Egypt, China, Through Asyria and Babylonia, to the Primitive Home, the Land of Akkad and SumerSmith, Hermann
History
The World's Earliest Music: Traced to Its Beginnings in Ancient Lands by Collected Evidence of Relics, Records, History, and Musical Instruments from Greece, Etruria, Egypt, China, Through Asyria and Babylonia, to the Primitive Home, the Land of Akkad and Sumer
Smith, Hermann
Music -- To 500 -- History and criticism
Yet _b_♭ is not the tonic; the Chinese have not in their music our kind
of reckoning; but their _e_♭, at the junction of the two tetrachords,
corresponds to the _mese_ or middle note of the Greek scale. And in
passing let me say that in the middle tetrachord you leave out in
descending the notes 10 and 4, and in ascending leave out 12 and 13,
according as the conjunct tetrachords are formed in the upper or in
the lower part of the scale; and thus the conditions required by the
tetrachord are maintained. Although, to make exposition easy, the notes
are here presented in our modern notation, you should still bear in
mind that the relations of note to note are not the same, are not exact
in ratios; most of the notes are flatter or sharper than indicated,
for the simple reason that there is no other ratio of interval than the
fourth taken in relation to intervening upper or lower octaves; and
since two fourths will not comprise an octave, each successive step in
fourths that are perfect takes us away from diatonic accuracy. Thus the
_g_ given as a fourth above _d_♭ looks odd; yet it is from that actual
pitch _length_, as one may say, that the _c_ above is derived. The _c_
is a flat note not expressed by our notation, but we have to signify
the notes in the nearest terms we can for convenience, none being quite
accurate. A very curious puzzle, you will answer; but very clear I can
assure you when you have once found your way through the labyrinth.
Writers upon the _Sheng_ all say that the pipes in the range numbered
2 and 6 are mere duplicates, and also 4 and 8. But they are altogether
mistaken; they give not any intimation whatever why they exist. If
it had been so then speaking lengths would have been in duplicate,
which they are not. But I can demonstrate why they are there; and
that they are not duplicates either as regards length or in pitch,
but are necessary in the evolution. There is nothing fantastic in the
arrangement; all the notes come naturally from one to the other; they
are necessary; not one too many to complete the idea, not one left out;
and, in truth, that _last_ one in the sequence given of evolution—which
I have marked ♭^v_{a}, to indicate an extra flatness—has every
suggestion of being an afterthought. For the pipe No. 2 in the order
exists for no other reason than to make an A♭ that shall be a true
fourth to the high D♭; a sounding pipe, for which a place is found
where otherwise a second mute pipe would have been, corresponding with
that on the opposite side. Why are there two pipes with the ventage
hole turned inwards to be closed by a finger of the right hand? Because
the thumb ranges over several pipes, but could not properly close more
than one at a time; and to meet the difficulty, pipes 3 and 4 have the
closure operating behind. So that when required for making fourths or
thirds with 2 or 5 or 6 or 7, in the order that comes under the thumb
of the right hand, then the finger comes to aid in producing the simple
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account