The World's Earliest Music: Traced to Its Beginnings in Ancient Lands by Collected Evidence of Relics, Records, History, and Musical Instruments from Greece, Etruria, Egypt, China, Through Asyria and Babylonia, to the Primitive Home, the Land of Akkad and SumerSmith, Hermann
History
The World's Earliest Music: Traced to Its Beginnings in Ancient Lands by Collected Evidence of Relics, Records, History, and Musical Instruments from Greece, Etruria, Egypt, China, Through Asyria and Babylonia, to the Primitive Home, the Land of Akkad and Sumer
Smith, Hermann
Music -- To 500 -- History and criticism
Here is another instance of the little reliance that can be placed
upon authority when it goes beyond its own particular line. In this
display which is the greater, its ignorance of the nature and structure
of musical instruments, or its scholastic jumble of science? This
passage I find in “The Life of the Greeks and Romans, by E. Guhl and
W. Koner, translated by Francis Hueffer.” “The aulos proper resembles
our hautboy and clarinet, differing, however, from the latter in the
fact of its lower notes being more important than the higher ones. The
aulos consisted of two connected tubes and a mouthpiece, to the latter
of which belonged two so-called tongues, in order to increase the
trembling motion of the air”; and of the capistrum or head straps, “the
purpose of this bandage was to soften the tone by preventing violent
breathing.” For connected errors of statement of fact, and audacity of
ignorance in drawing inferences, these authorities would be hard to
beat. If one thing is more certain than another on the authority of the
Etruscan vases, it is that the pipes were not in any way connected; and
in a stone head found by Cesnola, at Salamis, the strap passing round
the cheeks is carved, and shows over the mouth two separate apertures
for the pipes. This, already referred to, is absolutely conclusive.
In the illustration, the raised mouthpiece merely appears to be nearer
the top end in one pipe than in the other; for you should notice that
in the upper one the end is jagged, and I have no doubt that originally
both pipes were as the lower one, in which the end is completely
closed. But whether interiorily the end was blocked near where the
slant perforation entered the body of the pipe, I cannot see; I should
say that it was, because we find it so customarily in flutes of other
nations, both in modern and ancient usage. Here you will see that the
distance from the end to the mouthpiece is quite two inches, and that
end of the bronze cylinder was, I should think, a fixture; because I
perceive that the mouthpiece itself is fitted upon a movable segment.
Very curious that is, and no doubt had its purpose. Perhaps the design
admits of the partial turning round of the segment of bronze to obtain
a different angle of mouthpiece to the fancy of the player.
Then notice, further, that the top finger hole is but a short distance
from the mouthpiece; and, according to all experience with such pipes
reed blown, I judge that, as that hole gives the octave note to the
lower open end, some additional upper length is in demand, perhaps four
inches or more. So if the distance is reckoned from that hole to the
top of the table of mouthpiece as two inches, we require the reed and
its fittings to occupy a further extent of from two to three inches.
The diameter of the hole bored through the block, being but little more
than an eighth and a sixteenth, shows that reeds must have been used.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account