Assuming that in the progress of this subsidence local centres of
condensation subordinate to the general tendency would not be wanting,
he conceived that in this way solid nuclei might arise whose local
gravitation still further condensing, and so absorbing the nebulous
matter each in its immediate neighbourhood, might ultimately become
stars, and the whole nebula finally take on the state of a cluster of
stars.
Among the multitude of nebulae revealed by his telescope every stage of
this process might be considered as displayed to our eyes, and in every
modification of form to which the general principle might be conceived
to apply. The more or less advanced state of a nebula towards its
segregation into discrete stars, and of these stars themselves towards a
denser state of aggregation round a central nucleus, would thus be in
some sort an indication of age.
ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT
Cosmos, a Sketch of the Universe
Frederick Henry Alexander von Humboldt was born in Berlin on
September 14, 1769. In 1788 he made the acquaintance of George
Forster, one of Captain Cook's companions, and geological
excursions made with him were the occasion of his first
publications, a book on the nature of basalt. His work in the
administration of mines in the principalities of Bayreuth and
Anspach furnished materials for a treatise on fossil flora; and in
1827, when he was residing in Paris, he gave to the world his
"Voyage to the Equinoctial Regions of the New Continent," which
embodies the results of his investigations in South America. Two
years later he organised an expedition to Asiatic Russia, charging
himself with all the scientific observations. But his principal
interest lay in the accomplishment of that physical description of
the universe for which all his previous studies had been a
preparation, and which during the years 1845 to 1848 appeared under
the comprehensive title of "Cosmos, or Sketch of a Physical
Description of the Universe." Humboldt died on May 6, 1859.
_I.--The Physical Study of the World_
The natural world may be opposed to the intellectual, or nature to art
taking the latter term in its higher sense as embracing the
manifestations of the intellectual power of man; but these
distinctions--which are indicated in most cultivated languages--must not
be suffered to lead to such a separation of the domain of physics from
that of the intellect as would reduce the physics of the universe to a
mere assemblage of empirical specialities. Science only begins for man
from the moment when his mind lays hold of matter--when he tries to
subject the mass accumulated by experience to rational combinations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account