The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The crucial feature of the whole battle was Cæsar’s skilful disposition
of the 3000 men, placed, as some authorities describe it, in a kind
of ambuscade. It was this that upset the whole plan of Pompeius’
massive cavalry charge. The intelligent manœuvering of the Gallic and
German horse, first giving way, then returning to charge superior
numbers, is an illuminating illustration of the discipline prevailing
in all arms of Cæsar’s force. The close of the battle was followed
by the occupation of the Pompeian camp. The commander himself fled
in deep dejection from Greece, and met his death by an assassin’s
hands, when landing from a boat on the coast of Egypt. As a military
leader he had proved himself in this war unimaginative and sluggish.
He was a master of the technique of warfare, but failed to make use
of his opportunities; he seemed to have worked out his own campaign
in advance, and to have followed the scheme with deliberation, but in
other respects he was resourceless, both when the advantage was his own
and when the enemy made mistakes.
With two very much reduced legions and a few horse, Cæsar pursued
his rival to Egypt, where he was too late to take him alive. But the
factional contests in Egypt as to the royal succession and perhaps,
too, the desire to get his hands on the Egyptian treasury, induced the
conqueror to use this opportunity of asserting Roman sovereignty over
the dependent kingdom. It proved to be a rash step, for the Egyptians
were fanatically attached to their autonomous position, and Cæsar’s
small force was in great danger, not only from the Egyptian army, but
also from the turbulent Alexandrian populace, who tried and almost
succeeded in shutting him up in part of the city, and in preventing
supplies and reinforcements coming to him by sea. At times the Romans
were in great danger; there were furious combats in the city and in
the harbor, and it was not till many months had passed that Cæsar was
master of the situation. It took all the resources of his versatile
genius to hold out until large enough reinforcements came from the East
to bring the Alexandrians into subjection.
The whole winter after the battle of Pharsalus was spent in this way,
and when the war was over in March, there was three months more delay
in Alexandria, owing, it was said, to the fascination exerted over
the conqueror by the famous Egyptian queen, Cleopatra. During the
summer preparations were made for an extensive expedition throughout
the Farther East with a small body of men, the design being to pacify
the Oriental provinces. This proved not very difficult; most of the
problems were solved by diplomacy and only one battle was fought, that
of Zela, in Pontus, with Pharnaces, king of Pontus, who had taken
advantage of the civil war to try to set up an independent rule over a
large part of Asia Minor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account