The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
More serious than these matters of local politics was the sullenness of
Cæsar’s troops, which developed into open mutiny when they were ordered
to make ready for the coming campaign in Africa. They refused to budge
until the promises of money and land made them before the battle of
Pharsalus were strictly carried out. Cæsar dealt successfully with
the situation; he had no cash to give them, but he discharged them,
calling them citizens and not soldiers, and assured them at the same
time that all of their demands, with back interest, would be paid as
soon as he returned from Africa to celebrate his triumph. The veterans
were placed in a dilemma; they could not turn against Cæsar, for their
hope of reward lay in his success. Most of them were taken back as
volunteers for the African campaign. Before leaving Italy, Cæsar again
arranged to become Consul for the year 46, at the same time making
arrangements for the distribution of provincial charges. One assignment
was especially noteworthy: a pardoned Pompeian senator, Junius Brutus,
nephew of Cato, at the time in arms against Cæsar, was appointed to
Cisalpine Gaul.
A year and a half had passed since Pompeius’ defeat at Pharsalus, but
his cause was being energetically upheld in Africa, where his partisans
were making a final stand. It was here that Scipio, Labienus, Cato,
Afranius, and Petreius gathered together with the forces that remained,
ten legions in all, no inconsiderable force in itself; but there
were besides a large contingent of well-trained cavalry and heavy-
and light-armed troops, supplied by Juba, king of Numidia, who was
implacably hostile to Cæsar’s cause, and who meant to use the divisions
of the Romans for the purpose of carving out for himself an independent
kingdom. The only danger point, apart from an attack from Italy, lay
further west, where the two Mauretanian kings, Bocchus and Bogud, acted
together as a check to the power of the Numidians. They were able to
carry out their policy intelligently, because they had the help of a
Roman adventurer, Publius Sittius, suspected of being an accomplice of
Catiline, and for this reason an enemy of the remnant of the senatorial
party in Africa.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account