The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
In general, the exceptional position of the city of Rome was not
preserved; rather, provincial towns were organized after the model of
the imperial metropolis. Probably it was this bold step in reducing
Rome to the level of other towns, a proceeding strictly in harmony with
Cæsar’s consistent and established policy of equal and fair treatment
to the provinces, that led to the idle bit of gossip that he thought of
transferring the capital to the East, to Alexandria or Troy. Criminal
legislation was stiffened by adding to the recognized sentence of
exile forfeiture of property as a penalty. Care was taken that Roman
citizens should not travel abroad for a lengthy period, a provision
probably intended to protect the provincials from the presence of needy
individuals who would make use of official favor for questionable
financial schemes. But perhaps the most striking of all these measures
from the personal point of view was a law restricting the tenure of
provincial governorship. There were to be no more chances open for a
series of campaigns under one leader such as Cæsar had waged in Gaul.
Under this personal government there was little place for a Senate
except as a registering body, and Cæsar did not always allow it to
perform even this humble function. It came to have a make-believe
existence. Decrees were drawn up in its name that had actually never
come before it, and the conqueror’s unpopularity with the Senators was
increased by the introduction of new members, who had no aristocratic
traditions to maintain.
As an example of the versatility of his mind, no better one can be
given than the fact that Cæsar’s work in bringing order out of chaos
was extended to reorganization of the old Roman calendar, under which
the year lasted only 355 days, and attempts were made to make the
solar and civil years coincide by the occasional introduction of an
intercalary month, a process often guided by political or superstitious
motives. Since experienced scientists from Alexandria were called
on as experts, Cæsar’s reformed calendar of 365-1/4 days with an
intercalating day every fourth year was sufficiently accurate to stand
for centuries, and with a slight correction is still in use in the
civilized world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account