The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
necessary for his father, Pippin, to give up the rôle of Mayor of the
Palace and become “de jure” King of the Franks. This point was made
perfectly clear when the general assembly of Charles’ dominions was
held at Mainz in August, 800, and the Italian expedition was announced.
In Ravenna a stay of eight days was made by the invading army, and a
detachment was sent off to pacify the Lombard Duchy of Benevento. Not
far from Rome the King was greeted by the Pope, who then returned to
Rome to prepare for the official reception of the ruler, which took
place, on November 24th, with the customary ceremonies appropriate
to the patrician rank of the visitor. Eight days afterwards, Charles
having previously visited the Basilica of St. Peter’s, explained
publicly and officially the purpose of his coming to the city, viz.:
to investigate the charges against the Pope.
This was an informal and personal process, for, according to the
ecclesiastical canons, no one could officially judge a cause in
which the Pope was concerned. But Charles’ conception of his duties
as Patrician meant no mere perfunctory examination. For three weeks
there was a public hearing, like an extra-judicial examination before
a referee, of the rumors and charges against Leo’s conduct, a chance
being given to each side to ventilate its grievances. It is significant
that the Frankish King was won over to the view of his leading
ecclesiastics, including Alcuin, that the charges against Leo were
without foundation, and were only the product of personal enmity.
The difficulty was to give the decision such a form that, by avoiding a
judicial character, it would not infringe upon the Papal prerogative,
according to which the Bishop of Rome was not responsible to any
earthly tribunal. The bishops themselves explicitly adopted this
position by refusing to pass sentence on the head of the Church. After
this principle had been accepted, the Pope could declare himself
free from guilt. In so doing he was following a precedent set by
his predecessors in like circumstances, Marcellinus, Symmachus, and
Pelagius I.
So he proceeded on December 23d to exculpate himself by formally
declaring his innocence before a great assembly of secular and
ecclesiastical dignitaries, expressly mentioning that the proceeding
was voluntary and not required by the canons of the Church. In this way
the immediate cause of the expedition of the Franks was disposed of,
but Charles remained in Rome in order to provide for things needful in
the administration of his Italian dominions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account