The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Charles’ own point of view is shown plainly enough in the fact that
in 813 he proclaimed his son Louis Emperor and crowned him with his
own hands. As he acted here without requesting the coöperation of the
Pope, a purely lay method of conferring the imperial dignity may have
appealed better to his convictions than that followed in his own case.
But there could have been no improvised procedure in the ceremony at
St. Peter’s. Charles could not have been made Emperor against his will,
nor is it possible to harmonize the details of the ceremony with such
an explanation. How could the coronation have been an impulsive act on
the Pope’s part, taken without the Emperor’s knowledge, when the diadem
was in readiness, and the great congregation were prepared to repeat
without confusion the words of acclamation? Such preparations must
have had the consent of the Frankish ruler, for it is most unlikely
that he should not have known of them. His own objections, therefore,
were probably due to certain features of the ceremony actually carried
out, those, namely, by which the Pope took the initiative. A stricter
following of ancient precedent, at a time when no ceremonial change
should have been introduced by which the legitimacy of the succession
could be questioned, would have approved itself to Charles. An emperor
had to be provided for the West, and scrupulosity in following
precedents was desirable, especially in view of the doubt as to whether
the Empress Irene could, as a woman, legally hold supreme power at
Constantinople.
It must be remembered that there had been several attempts made in
the seventh and eighth centuries to revive the connection between
Rome and the imperial dignity. But they had failed because there was
no considerable and acknowledged political force behind them. Now,
under the extensive rule of the Frankish King, the elements required
to give an actual validity to the imperial claim were present in an
overwhelming degree. Charles was in control of most of the territory
once belonging to the empire in Western Europe, and along the Eastern
and Southeastern frontiers he had succeeded in extending its limits--a
task unparalleled by the achievements in these same regions of the
greatest of the Roman Emperors. The Teutonic peoples, who centuries
before had made their first appearance as “fœderati,” in the service
of the Empire, were now component parts of it, and had definitely
entered the sphere of Roman civilization. What Athaulf had deemed to be
impossible, what neither Odoacer, Theodoric, nor the Lombard Kings had
tried or dared to do, Charles had done, now that, advancing from the
title of Patrician, which had been held often by the barbarian rulers,
he claimed for the Germans the full right to the imperial name.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account