The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The financial administration of the government offered few
complications, because the obligations on the state in the way of
expenses were most limited. The chief item in the imperial budget,
which preserved the personal and household character of the Merovingian
period, was for the maintenance of the royal palaces, for the presents
made by the king to churches, to foreign princes, or to the great
officers of the Empire. Direct taxes were of the capitation type,
graded according to the position of the individual taxed. The ordinary
fiscal resources were made up from the income of the King from his
own estates, from tributes paid by vassal nations, from war booty,
obligatory annual gifts, and indirect taxes. The revenue from the royal
estates, which were excellently managed, was considerable, and there
must have been a large sum credited to the account of booty from the
various successful wars.
The “benevolences,” to use a term familiar in the constitutional and
financial history of England, were not fixed, and the records speak
in an indefinite way of the contribution offered by faithful subjects
of the Empire in the annual assemblies. But it is plain that these
so-called gifts included precious stones and valuable fabrics, as well
as gold and silver.
The principal indirect taxes were in the form of personal service,
rather than in money payments. Local taxation meant special work on
roads, bridges, and making dikes. For the great bridge at Mainz, labor
was called for from many localities, because it was an imperial work,
intended for the common benefit of the whole Empire. Transportation
dues are frequently mentioned in the Carolingian laws, as well as
the right of “lodging,” by which the inhabitants of a community were
obliged to lodge and entertain the King and his officials on their
travels, and to receive the representatives of foreign powers and
others, to whom the royal privilege was given. A bishop, for example,
had the right to receive forty loaves a day, three lambs, three
measures of ale, a gallon of milk, three chickens, fifteen eggs, and
four measures of feed for his horses.
The greatest difficulties of the government were not financial, but
military, for the state of warfare was almost continuous, especially
along the Alps, the Pyrenees, and from the Eider to the lower Danube.
The summons for calling together the units of the military forces
was either carried by means of direct envoys or by letters sent to
the counts, bishops, and abbots, and sometimes by the “missi.” These
officials had to see that all those who were liable to service should
be prepared to take their places when the call to arms was given. One
of the “missi” writes: “let all be so prepared that, if the order to
leave comes in the evening, they will leave without delay for Italy on
the morning of the next day, but if it comes in the morning, in the
evening of the same day.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account