The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
But this recognition of the rights of Rome did not prevent Charles from
regarding himself as the director of the Frankish Church. He speaks
openly of himself as “the pilot of the Church in his domains,” and
when writing Leo III he explains his conception of the relation of the
kingdom and the Papacy. “Our task it is, by the help of God, to protect
by our arms outwardly the Holy Church of Christ from assaults of the
heathen and from being wasted by the unbelievers and to establish it
within by recognizing the Catholic faith. Your duty it is to support
as Moses did, with uplifted arms our service in the battlefield, that
the Christian people, being led through your petitions and prepared
by God, may have constantly and everywhere victory over the enemies
of His name.” While Charles assigned to the Pope a religious activity
and nothing more, he regarded his own guardianship over the churches
as extending beyond questions of their material welfare. In 789 in
a message to the bishops he stated that he wished to coöperate with
them, using his power as a ruler, and working through his subordinates
to improve things where improvement was possible. These were the
principles he used in his Church policy. Just as in secular matters he
was not absolute, but followed the laws and customs of the people over
whom he ruled, so in regard to the Church he observed its canonical
system with a reverence for its minute details. But his capitularies,
as we have seen, are filled with ecclesiastical legislation, and in
Church matters the King acted as the supreme authority. Even synods
laid their decrees before him for correction, and to secure his
authoritative sanction. There was little place for a fully developed
Papacy in an ecclesiastical system worked along these lines, and there
are no examples during Charles’ reign of Papal interference in the
administration of the Church in his own domains. The Pope, where and
when he did act, did so in concert with Charles; even in cases of
excommunication there was an understanding with the King; and often the
extreme penalty was inflicted under his initiative. Even the exercise
of discipline in connection with the episcopate was left in Charles’
hands without any protest on the part of the Pope.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account