The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The empire of Charles, though it was the concrete creation of an
ideal government crudely understood and most inadequately worked out,
illustrated the liberty-loving principles of the Germanic peoples who
were gathered in its fold. In this respect, with all its imperfections,
the rule of the great Frankish monarch is more closely allied to the
political principles of modern times than were the more ambitious and
more logical creations of the conquerors who preceded and who followed
him. Unconsciously, it may be, his system of government gave scope for
local diversities and recognized rights of deep-planted traditions
with a generosity which is characteristic not of empires such as those
of Cæsar and Napoleon, but of federal republics of the type of the
United States, and the Federation of the Swiss Cantons. When he aimed
at uniformity he did not lose sight of the fact that he was the ruler
of heterogeneous nationalities, on whose good-will and coöperation the
permanence of the Empire was dependent. The pressure of centralization
was lightly exercised, simply because in the Emperor’s mind the ideas
of Roman rule had to pass through the medium of German tribal tradition.
There was no steam roller set to work to equalize, if not to pulverize,
the component parts of his realm. The divisions were not destroyed,
but were rather combined in a higher political unity. The kingdom
of the West Goths was at least preserved, though it had less of a
definite character than the Lombard kingdom, which the Emperor took
special pains to preserve in its integrity. Even the traditions of the
Ostrogoths were allowed a value in so far as they stood for a strenuous
opposition to the imperial policy of uniformity of administration
and to the economic sacrifice of the local centers to the purposes
of world politics. Lombard influence had overcome both Ostrogothic
and Roman rule; it was irreconcilable, and stood for the stubborn
and conservative standpoint that made the first Germanic invaders
difficult to assimilate in the provinces of the Roman Empire, where by
force of arms they became the ruling class. A similar obstinacy, with
its preservation of the original political type, marked the Lombard
kingdom and duchies which Charles had conquered. A picturesque example
of local initiative was not crowded out by the Frankish overlordship
in Venice; the seafaring community came into being in a favored spot,
on the confines of the two empires, too remote to be crushed from
Constantinople, and protected from the Western ruler by a few leagues
of shallow sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account