The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
There followed in succession to Ourkhan, not Souliman, who died in one
of the raids into Thrace, but Murad I, whose mother was a Greek. In
some respects he was a greater leader than his father, Ourkhan; he is
spoken of in the chronicles as eloquent, devoted to justice, and a
strict disciplinarian. At the same time he was beloved by his troops
because of his generosity. Although he had no education, not even the
ability to read and write, he was known as a great builder of mosques,
schools, and hospitals. When he had a document to sign he dipped
four fingers in the ink, and, keeping them as far apart as possible,
impressed them on the paper; the impression so made was worked up
artistically into the imperial Osmanli seal. His success in warfare
was due not only to his own valor, but also to the number of able
commanders who conducted his campaigns under his directions.
The European successes of his elder brother could not be followed up
immediately, because the notable victories of the Osmanlis had excited
the jealousy of the remaining Seldjouk emirs in Asia. Ourkhan had
himself warred with the Prince of Karasi and so been able to add Mysia
with Pergamum to his territories. Now Murad’s reign was opened by a
contest with the emir of Karamania, another Ala-ed-Din, who stirred
up many of the Osmanli dependencies to revolt. The city of Angora was
the center of this insurrection. Murad overcame the rebels, placed a
garrison in Angora, and adopted a policy of gradual absorption in order
to keep the Seldjouk emirates from forming a coalition against him.
One was ceded outright and a large part of another became the marriage
portion of the wife of Bajesid, son of Murad. The situation in Asia,
owing to the restlessness of the remaining emirs, who represented
another branch of the Turkish stock, continued to be a source of
difficulty for many years, and the final and complete conquest of the
whole of Anatolia only took place when the European Empire of the
Osmanlis was an accomplished fact.
The armies of Murad had now occupied Thrace; hence they were brought
into immediate contact with the two strong Slavic nations on the Balkan
peninsula, the Bulgarians and the Servians. These South Slavic peoples,
after centuries of struggle for supremacy with the Eastern Empire, had
been overpowered by the superior wealth, strategy, and civilization of
the rulers of Constantinople in the beginning of the eleventh century.
But the Latin conquest of Constantinople made it easy for them to
regain the ground they had lost. In the course of the struggle between
the Byzantines and the Crusaders, the movements towards independence
among the Servians and Bulgarians were facilitated. After the year 1261
accessions of territory were made by both branches of the Slavic race.
Besides contesting possession of Balkan territory with the Magyars they
warred among themselves for the acquisition of lands in the Maritza
basin and along the rivers Strouma and Vardar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account