The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
As a military power the revived Greek Empire was pathetically feeble.
Its last great leader in war was Michael VIII, who had retaken
Constantinople from the Latins, a conquest on a slight scale, since
the Latins were even weaker than their opponents. The measure of Greek
offensive is attested by the inability of any Greek Emperor to retake
the Asiatic provinces from the Turk, to annex the Empire of Trebizond,
to resist the Slavs in the Balkans, or to reoccupy the islands of the
Ægean and drive the Franks from Greece. Even in the interior there was
no effective administration. In every Greek city there were colonies of
Italian merchants, either Genoese or Venetian, who formed independent
communities under their own podestà. The army was filled with foreign
contingents, who were not even mercenary troops, because the Empire
could not afford to hire soldiers. They were auxiliary forces,
organized as complete military units under their own natural chief, and
were a constant menace. When they saw fit, they pillaged the country
and sometimes fought among themselves. They were under no kind of
control from the central or local authorities; within their own camps
on the frontiers, in the provinces, even under the walls of the capital
itself, they obeyed their own commanders and not the Emperor.
One of the most radical changes for the worse in the revived Greek
Empire, a change that marked the contrast with the heroic period of
Byzantine military enterprise, was the lack of a fleet. For his naval
operations the Emperor depended on the Venetians or Genoese, a most
unsatisfactory arrangement, for, owing to the jealousy of these two
commercial states, if one were the ally of Constantinople, the other
was certain to be on the opposite side. In 1296 the Venetians, after
defeating their rivals at sea, laid siege to the Pera and Galata
sections of Constantinople, the seat of the Genoese colony, and in
setting fire to the quarter destroyed many Greek houses. Later on, the
Genoese revenged themselves by massacring the Venetian residents of
Constantinople.
The anarchy was increased when, owing to rival claimants to the throne,
open civil war broke out, as it did frequently in the course of the
fourteenth century. Cantacuzene, an official in the imperial palace,
who became rival Emperor, while Anna of Saxony was regent during the
minority of her son, John V, after the death of his father, Andronicus
III, allied himself with the Servians and with the Seldjouk emir of
Konia. Anna tried to strengthen her side by calling upon Ourkhan, the
Osmanli Sultan. In the war that followed the Turks were authorized
to seize the citizens of the empire, and the rival governments placed
at the disposition of their Mohammedan allies seaports and vessels.
The captives taken were sent to Asia and sold as slaves in the Turkish
emirates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account