The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The menace caused by the Ottoman conquests was now being appreciated in
Western Europe, where, through the preaching of a crusade by Urban V, a
league was formed between Louis of Anjou, King of Hungary, and several
of the most powerful princes of the Balkan peninsula, both Roumanian
and Slav, for the purpose of driving out the Turks from their newly
acquired European possessions. With an army of 60,000 men the Christian
leaders reached the river Maritza, two days’ journey from Adrianople.
Murad was in Asia, besieging a Greek city on the Propontis, but he
was not needed, since a small detachment of the army of his general,
Lala-Schahin, came in contact with the Christians near Kermianon, and
put them to flight in a panic, in which the two Servian leaders lost
their lives. (1371.)
This victory is set down in the Servian records as a great national
disaster, and deservedly so. It ended their resistance, and it handed
over to the Turks the rest of Thrace, Bulgaria, and a part of Servia.
Significant of the impression made by the conquest was the action of
the people of Ragusa, who signed a treaty of peace, inspired by a
desire to gain commercial advantages from the new Turkish conquests.
They agreed to pay an annual tribute of 500 golden ducats, and thus
they inaugurated a policy imitated by many of their stronger neighbors,
who preferred to make a good bargain with the Ottomans rather than try
the fortunes of war under the auspices of rival Christian states, whose
political aggrandizement, in case a victory were won over the infidel,
was dreaded even more than the expansion of an alien race.
Yet the theory of a united Christendom was maintained despite its
pitiable outcome in the Balkans. Elsewhere there were brilliant feats
of arms, but they were isolated, and being directed by no consistent
plan, proved of no lasting advantage. Peter of Cyprus, a representative
of the Latin dynasty which had held the island since the days of the
earlier Crusades, regarded himself as the guardian of Christian hopes
in the Orient because of his titular dignity of King of Jerusalem. He
took Alexandria in 1365, and helped by Rhodes, Genoa, and contingents
sent by the Pope, he later took Satalieh (Attalia), a place situated in
one of the Seldjouk emirates. Some advantages were gained, too, on the
coast of Syria.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account