The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
This picturesque barbarity appealed to the imagination of the Turkish
ruler, who, as an artist in cruelty, conceded that Vlad belonged to a
class above him. When the Turkish sovereign made a punitive expedition
to Bucharest, he found the approach to the town, half a mile long,
lined with stakes, on which were rotting the bodies of 2000 dead Turks.
“How,” Mohammed said, “can we despoil of his estates a man who is not
afraid to defend it by such means as these?” Vlad hung on the invading
army, always inflicting losses, without showing himself long enough
to be attacked in a formal battle. Using his familiarity with the
Turkish language, he penetrated with some companions into the midst
of the Turkish camp, and would have succeeded in murdering Mohammed
himself, had not a mistake been made in selecting the tent. Instead of
the Sultan one of the pashas was killed. Though there are conflicting
accounts as to the details of Vlad’s versatility in defense, we know
that Mohammed gave up his plan of aggression against Wallachia and
returned to his capital, Adrianople.
Vlad’s career was cut short by the enmity of his neighbor the Moldavian
King, Stephen, who, afraid of his influence, drove him from his throne,
although he had relied on Vlad to promote his own interests when the
Moldavian succession was in dispute. This was, of course, a gross
error in statesmanship, for the only possibility of resisting Turkish
aggression in these extreme Eastern lands of Europe depended on the
close coöperation of Moldavia and Wallachia. If Wallachia were once
occupied by the Turks, Moldavia’s invasion was certain to be the next
step. After Vlad’s expulsion, he took refuge at the court of Matthias
of Hungary.
His successor, Radu, was entirely devoted to Turkish interests; and
soon after this change of rule in Wallachia, Stephen of Moldavia
was able to seize the seaport town of Kilia, whose inhabitants were
not unwilling to accept an overlord of better reputation than Radu,
whose close relations with the Sultan had made him an object of
contempt (1465). In the hostilities that followed between Matthias of
Hungary and Stephen of Moldavia, the Hungarian King, who had taken up
Vlad’s cause, was beaten at the battle of Baia. Stephen then invaded
Transylvania, captured Peter Aron, the pretender to the throne of
Moldavia, and put him to death. Peace was restored with the Hungarians
on terms that were advantageous to Stephen, who received two fortresses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account