The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Internal troubles in Asia Minor, defeats in Hungary, and a long,
troublesome war with the Sultan of Egypt brought the warlike
enterprises of Bajesid to an end. The Sultan’s sons through their
dissensions darkened the close of his reign; all three rebelled. Of
the three, the most successful in opposing his father’s power was
Selim, who won the Janitschars over to his side, and through their
interference was able to enter Constantinople in triumph, and there
enforce his own conditions. Bajesid first offered large sums if Selim
would withdraw to the Asiatic province, of which he was governor;
finally he consented to accept him as heir and co-regent on the throne;
but Selim had secured the influence of the troops, and they demanded
the Sultan’s immediate abdication. Bajesid was obliged to accede to
their request, and only asked that he might be allowed to withdraw to
die at Demotica, the place where he was born. The third day after his
abdication he died. Because of its suddenness, his death, as was so
often the case in those days, was said to be due to poison.
Selim’s path after his accession was anything but smooth; the troops
were not amenable to discipline, and there were a host of brothers and
nephews, who were in no mood to accept him as their lord. Besides his
own son, Souliman, there were ten princes who stood near the throne.
All were taken and murdered. Though Selim affected to explain their
executions as due to reasons of state, his acts were severely judged
by his contemporaries. The Turks called him “The Inflexible,” while
in the West he was entitled “The Savage.” Foscolo, the Venetian,
described him as the cruelest of men, “a man who dreams only of
conquests and wars.” He was a well-educated man who favored the pursuit
of literature, and it was said that the only individual who was ever
able to induce him to revoke a death sentence was the grand mufti,
Ali Djemali. His viziers felt the implacable nature of their master;
seven of them were executed, for whenever the soldiers were restless
the vizier was made a victim of the Sultan’s discontent. According to
an old report one of them only agreed to accept the dangerous office
after Selim had beaten him with his own hands. Intractable at home,
Selim, so far as Europe was concerned, proved a pacific prince, his
name being recorded only in connection with one expedition against the
Christians. His Christian vassals, too, were left undisturbed; all
that he exacted from them was the payment of a regular tribute. To the
Moslem dissenters in Persia of the Shiite sect, he showed himself an
implacable persecutor, all the more because his animosity was excited
by the encouragement given to his rebellious brother Ahmed and his
three sons by Ismail, the master of Persia. Ismail also negotiated
an alliance with the Sultan of Egypt against the Osmanlis. Selim
began in his own provinces by organizing a systematic massacre of the
schismatics. Then followed a holy war against the Shah, in 1513, in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account