The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
As head of the Empire, the Sultan’s various titles are significant of
the progressive stages of Ottoman development from a tribe to a great
world power. The sovereign was still called Khan, as the head of a
Turkish nomadic horde. When the Turks were converted to Islam, there
was first added the title emir, an Arabic word, Chief of Believers;
then came the name sultan, king; after the conquest of Constantinople,
the Persian term padishah, king of kings, came into use. As we have
seen, the conquest of Syria, of Egypt, and Arabia, made the Sultan
defender of the holy cities and khalif.
After the conquest of the capital of the Cæsars, the influence of
Byzantine traditions introduced a rigid system of court ceremonial;
the days of patriarchal simplicity were closed; the person of the
Sultan was raised in dignity. The change is clearly indicated in an
edict by Mohammed: “It is not my will that anyone should eat with my
imperial majesty; our ancestors were wont to eat with their ministers,
but I have abolished it.” The influence of the Byzantine bureaucratic
hierarchy can be traced in the method of Ottoman administration; even
in small details the permanence of the Roman imperial tradition is
noteworthy. The sovereign’s documents were, like those of his Greek
predecessors, written in gold, purple, and azure. His letters of
victory are but a continuation of the “litterae laureatae,” while
the bakkchich given to the Janitschars is but a reminiscence of the
Imperial donation.
But actual assimilation between the Turks and their subject peoples
was prevented by difference of religion. Racial differences made no
distinction between Greeks, Albanians, Slavs, and Roumanians; they were
all orthodox Christians, while the same people, if they became converts
to Islam, were turned into Ottomans. The two types of religious
allegiance were mutually irreconcilable. The peculiarity of Ottoman
absolutism is to be found in the exclusion from governmental offices
both of the free Moslem and the free Christian subjects of the Empire.
The administration from top to bottom was in the hands of slaves, and
these slaves were largely recruited from the children of Christian
families of the subject races, who were constantly exposed to a
detestable and unnatural form of oppression. The conquered populations
were ruled despotically by men of Christian birth, who, during their
initiation into slavery, had become Moslems. The famous Admiral Dragut
was the son of a Christian of Asia Minor. Many of the famous generals
were taken from Christian Albanian, Bosnian, and Dalmatian families. Of
forty-eight grand viziers, only twelve were of Moslem birth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account