The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
There was no reason for Spain to become a colonizing power in the
modern sense, since the peninsula was a sparsely populated country,
large tracts of land having been opened up for occupation by the
Christian conquests of Moorish territory. In preceding centuries,
when the Christian princes began to win back, piece by piece, the
lands belonging to the Moslems, a conciliatory policy had been adopted
towards the conquered race; the Moors had kept their personal liberties
and had been encouraged to group themselves in autonomous communities
in the suburbs of Christian cities. Even when Granada was taken,
favorable terms were given to its inhabitants, although in the end the
promises were broken. They were conceded liberty of person, trade,
education, and worship, the protection of Mohammedan law, administered
by Mohammedan judges, and the benefit of mixed tribunals. But here and
elsewhere Ferdinand’s methods were a consistent application of the
principles of an autocrat, and, when the New World fell as a prize to
the Spanish conquerors, the usages of expansion by conquest at home
in the Iberian peninsula were mercilessly applied. When Malaga was
taken, the captive inhabitants were sold as slaves; one-third of the
proceeds of the sale was taken for the redemption of Christian captives
in Africa; another was given to those who had served in the army of
occupation either as mercenaries or as officials, and the remaining
portion was paid into the royal treasury. As to the land, it was laid
out for a colony. The large tracts opened to colonization were offered
on easy conditions to the Christian inhabitants of Spain.
It was not land hunger, therefore, which prompted the Spanish monarchs
to accept Columbus’ scheme of a westward route to the rich empires of
the Orient. Profit-bringing trade by which stores of specie could be
accumulated attracted the founders of Spanish absolutism. The project
itself was not viewed with skepticism; its scientific basis was cogent;
there were besides widely circulated stories of land existing in the
West. But the one practical difficulty in the way of fitting out the
proposed expedition was the war with the Moors of Granada, by which the
Spanish treasury had been exhausted. After the city fell in January,
1492, several months were spent in haggling over terms. Columbus
had made up his mind that if the voyage were sucessful he should be
adequately rewarded for his trouble. Apart from conditions as to
offices and the administration of the newly acquired possessions, it
was agreed that he was to receive one clear tenth of all merchandise,
whether gold, silver, pearls, spices, or whatsoever else was gained
or gotten for the crown in his new jurisdiction. Moreover, there was
a further clause inserted that in case Columbus should choose to
contribute to the equipment of vessels employed in the new trade to
the extent of one-eighth, he was to be at liberty to do so, thereby
entitling himself to one-eighth part of the profits.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account