The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The difficulty of historical research in reconstructing the records of
these aboriginal peoples is due partly to poor methods of transmission
and also to the fact that so many of the original documents were
lost at the time of the Spanish conquest and before. Chronological
reckonings were kept for the purpose of marking the days on which
tributes and sacrifices were due. To this were added the figures of
chieftains, the notices of tribal conquests, and such events as floods,
famines, and eclipses. All of this miscellaneous popular lore was
embodied in paintings, executed by a large class of artists, some of
whom were women, on paper or fiber rolls or on prepared skins. For
this picture-writing skins, oblong in shape and of great length, were
employed. Along with these “pinturas” there was handed down an oral
method of interpretation. Our knowledge of Mexican history has to be
derived from the surviving examples of these picture rolls and from the
traditional explanations which were taken down in writing at the time
of the entrance of the Spaniards into the country.
The tradition existing in Mexico at this period told how the primitive
stock inhabiting the land were giants, many of whom had perished by
flood, fire, and earthquake. Then came a body of men who wished to
reach the sun, and for this purpose they reared a tower. The sun,
angered at the presumption of the earth-dwellers in aspiring to
share with the gods the dwellings in the heavens, summoned all of
the supernatural powers; the building was destroyed; and the guilty
mortals were scattered over the earth. A mythical legislator then
appears in Central America who teaches the people, the offspring of
the giants, the arts of civilized life. The basis of this folklore
may not unreasonably be ascribed to the finding of the bones of large
extinct animals and, on the site of the Central American ruined
cities, of mammoth statues of human beings. The residuum of truth
seems to be that the Mexicans of the Conquest were correct in their
common tradition that their ancestors had come from the north, and
that the country had been gradually occupied by successive swarms of
invaders who came south while they were still dependent on hunting
game for their food and were finally reduced to settled forms of life
by the cultivation of maize. The various tribes who took part in this
migration are called by the Mexican word “Nahuatlaca,” used to denote
those communities who were dependent on agriculture and followed a
nahua or rule of life dictated by a custom administered by hereditary
chiefs. At the beginning of the sixteenth century the Nahuatlaca had
reached the present limits of Costa Rica. That there were aboriginal
inhabitants is inferred from the mention of the Otomi, the Huaxtecs,
the Totonacs, and the Ulmecs, who at the time of the Conquest occupied
districts not overrun by the Nahuatlacan immigration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account