The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Nowhere else could there be found a better recruiting ground for the
legions, and nowhere also, on account of the general intelligence of
the inhabitants, would the personal qualities of a general find a more
immediate response. The tactfulness of Cæsar had already been put to
the test in the arena of political life; he had learned how to make
friends and to hold them. Apart from the technical gifts of military
art, the personal charm of Cæsar’s character was a great factor in
securing for him an army made up of devoted troops and officers.
They trusted him, and they were held to him as a leader, because he
seems from the first to have been able to establish close relations
of a spontaneous and genuine type with those who were under him. His
army was not a mere fighting machine, but an organism reflecting the
individual driving power and coolness of the man who led it.
The series of campaigns in Gaul begins with Cæsar’s successful blocking
of the migration of the Helvetii. All that is known of the details
of the strategy employed by the Romans is derived from Cæsar’s own
report, which has been frequently criticised as intentionally obscure
and misleading. It must be remembered that the famous commentaries on
the Gallic wars were hurriedly dictated, and were meant to tell the
public what the commander-in-chief wished them to know and nothing
more. For example, many modern authorities are agreed that the numbers
of the migrating Helvetii are very much overestimated by Cæsar and that
the real purpose of their migration was artfully concealed. Napoleon,
who was a past master in falsifying military records, declared
that the campaign against the Helvetii as narrated by Cæsar was
incomprehensible.
The real situation in Gaul prior to the migration seems to have been as
follows. As we have said, Ariovistus, the German king, was in control
of the central part of the country. This overlordship was burdensome
to the Gauls, who paid him a yearly tribute. A prince of the Ædui,
Divitiacus, had turned to the Romans for help, but his request was
rejected, for Ariovistus, during Cæsar’s own consulship, had been
acknowledged as king and formally declared an ally and friend of the
Roman people. There was another party among the Ædui, led by Dumnorix,
the brother of Divitiacus, who favored throwing off the German yoke,
and urged a general uprising of the Gauls, unassisted by the Romans.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account