The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Cæsar marched to meet the Germans, and in a conference with their
leaders told them they must leave Gallic territory, at the same time
offering to make an arrangement by which they could receive land on
the right bank of the Rhine. They seemed disposed to accept these
terms, but soon hostilities were precipitated because, while the terms
were being discussed, the Germans attacked some of the Gallic cavalry
attached to Cæsar’s army. The Romans moved suddenly, and according to
Cæsar’s own account, butchered in cold blood men, women, and children
to the number of 430,000, a hearsay number of course, but there is no
reason for doubting that there was a massacre. No Roman was killed and
few were wounded. Even in Rome, notoriously insensible to deeds of
blood, this wholesale butchery caused disgust. Cato proposed that Cæsar
should be given up to the barbarians as an act of justice. But the
Senate contented itself with decreeing honors for the victory, although
it was proposed, but not carried, that the operations in Gaul should be
investigated by a commission.
To finish up the moral effect made on the Germans by the massacre of
their kinsmen, Cæsar built a trestle across the Rhine, transported his
army into German territory, and for a short time his soldiers were
employed in laying waste the country contiguous to the river. He had
no intention of penetrating to the interior of the country, and soon
returned to Gaul, after destroying the bridge he had built.
This year’s campaign had been marked by daring adventures; it was to
have a spectacular close in the expedition to Britain, an island known
in a general way to traders from Gaul, but never yet visited by a Roman
official or by a Roman army. Cæsar affected to believe that resistance
to Roman rule in Gaul was being supported from Britain. In any case a
protectorate of the island seemed to offer great material advantages,
for exaggerated reports were in circulation as to its wealth and
fertility. The expedition was only a partial success. A few tribes made
their submission, but the troops had to be hastily withdrawn, because
Cæsar desired to be back on the mainland before the equinoctials set
in, as the fleet had already severely suffered in a storm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account