The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
As a matter of fact, the old governmental methods of the Republic were
adapted only to the conditions of a city community with a homogeneous
population. There had been a breakdown years before Cæsar’s time, and
the question now was who should benefit from this chaotic situation.
The senators meant to get Cæsar out of Gaul, reduce him to the ranks
of a private individual, and then ruin him by some legal prosecution
in connection with his eight years of provincial rule. The chief
asset of the Senate was Pompeius’ jealousy of Cæsar as a rival of his
military glory; he was soured because he could not get the position
and the influence for which his early record had marked him out.
Pompeius was proconsul of Spain, according to the arrangement made at
the last meeting of the triumvirs. It was only carried out nominally;
he had no intention of losing his control of Rome, a control which
depended on his presence at the center of affairs. Contrary to all
precedent, he governed his province by means of deputies. He was also
in special charge of the corn supply, a position valuable as a means
of propitiating the people with votes. He arranged to have a five-year
extension of his proconsular power in Spain, and his influence on the
Senate is shown by their willingness to allot him 100 talents a year
for the maintenance of his troops. He used his patronage exclusively
to advance his own personal interests, oblivious of the compact with
Cæsar, showing altogether that, while he meant to stand outside the
law, the chicanery of legislation could well be used to block the path
of his rival.
Cæsar, who had not forgotten to retain the favor of the Roman populace
by entertainments and benefactions, and who had all the skill of a
party boss in retaining the allegiance of friends and followers, had
three very strong allies back of him, leaving aside his natural
superiority in capacity and in shrewdness to Pompeius. His conquest of
Gaul, followed as it was by a very judicious treatment of the conquered
tribes, gave him the support of a warlike population ready to act on
his behalf. Moreover, the reduction of the country had unlocked a
store of wealth, which was naturally in his hands; the slaves alone,
collected from the captives, represented as capital a very large sum of
money. Then there were the seasoned legions on whose loyalty he could
depend.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account