The World War and What was Behind It; Or, The Story of the Map of EuropeBénézet, Louis Paul
History
The World War and What was Behind It; Or, The Story of the Map of Europe
Bénézet, Louis Paul
Europe -- History; World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
“The Norwegian government will not again state its views, as it
has already done so on several occasions, as to the violation of
the principles of the freedom of the high seas incurred by the
proclamation of large tracts of the ocean as a war zone and by
the sinking of neutral merchant ships not carrying contraband.
“It has made a profound impression on the Norwegian people that
not only have German submarines continued to sink peaceful
neutral merchant ships, paying no attention to the fate of their
crews, but that even German warships adopted the same tactics.
The Norwegian government decided to send this note in order to
bring to the attention of the German government the impression
these acts have made upon the Norwegian people.”
The two arguments that the Germans used in trying to justify
themselves for their inhuman methods with the submarine are: (1)
that on these ships which were sunk were supplies for the French
and British armies, the arrival of which would aid them in
killing Germans, and (2) that the English, by their blockade of
Germany, were doing something which was contrary to the laws of
nations and starving German women and children, and, therefore,
since England was breaking some rules of the war game, Germany
had the right to go ahead and break others.
The trade of the United States in selling war supplies to France
and England was a sore spot with Germany. They claimed that the
United States was unfair in selling to the Entente and not to
them. Of course, this was foolish, as has been pointed out, for
the United States was just as ready to sell to Germany as to the
Allies, as was shown by the two voyages of the _Deutschland_. If
our government had forbidden our people to sell war supplies at
all, and if other neutral countries had done the same thing, then
the result would be that all wars would be won by the country
which made the biggest preparation for war in times of peace. A
law passed by neutral countries forbidding their merchants from
selling munitions would leave a non-military nation, which had
not been getting ready for war, absolutely at the mercy of a
neighbor who for years had been storing up shells and guns for
the purpose of unrighteous conquest. So clear was this right to
sell munitions that Germany did not dare protest, but ordered
Austria to do so instead. In reply, our government was able to
point out cases where Austrian firms had sold guns, etc., to
Great Britain during the Boer War as you have already been told,
and Austria had no answer to give.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account