The world war : $b a history of the nations and empires involved and a study of the events culminating in the great conflictMarshall, Logan
History
The world war : $b a history of the nations and empires involved and a study of the events culminating in the great conflict
Marshall, Logan
Europe -- History -- 1789-1900; Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
By this time the interest of the whole world was enlisted in the case,
the action of the French courts was everywhere condemned, and in the
end it was deemed advisable to bring Dreyfus back to France and accord
him a new trial. This trial, which lasted from August 7 to September 7,
1899, indicated that he had been convicted on the most flimsy and
uncertain evidence, largely conjectural in character, while there was
strong evidence in his favor. Yet the judges of the court-martial
seemed biased against him, and by a vote of three judges to two, he was
again found guilty—“of treason, with extenuating circumstances,” as if
treason could be extenuated.
The whole affair was a transparent travesty upon justice, and the
method by which it was conducted threw into a strong light the faulty
character of the French method of trial. The result, indeed, was so
flagrantly unsatisfactory that no further punishment was inflicted upon
the accused, and in July, 1906, his case was brought before the Court
of Appeals, with the result that he was acquitted and restored to his
rank in the army.
CHURCH AND STATE
Later events of interest in French history had to do with the status of
the Catholic Church in France and with the relations of France, Germany
and Spain to Morocco, the latter more than once threatening war. The
union of Church and State in France, which had only before been broken
during the turbulent period of the Revolution, was definitely abrogated
by a law of December 19, 1905, proclaiming the separation of Church and
State in that country. By this, and a supplementary act in 1907, the
Catholic church was put on the same footing in the republic as the
Protestant and Jewish congregations. The use of church buildings, which
had been the property of the state since the Revolution, was granted
only under conditions which the Pope refused to accept, and religious
liberty made a radical advance in France.
THE MOROCCO CONTROVERSY
Meanwhile troubles had arisen on the borders of Algeria between the
French army of occupation and the unruly Moroccan tribes beyond the
boundary. The efforts of France to abate these disturbances, which
found support in the British government, aroused opposition in Germany,
which objected to the claim of France to a predominant interest in
Morocco. The affair went so far that Emperor William II visited
Tangier, had a conference with the representatives of the Sultan, and
was reported to have agreed to enforce the integrity of Morocco. The
friction that resulted was allayed by a conference of the Powers held
at Algeciras, Spain, in 1905, and the trouble was temporarily settled
by a series of resolutions establishing a number of reforms in Morocco,
the privileged position of France along the Moroccan-Algerian frontier
being acknowledged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account