Aeronautics -- United States -- Biography; Wright, Orville, 1871-1948; Wright, Wilbur, 1867-1912
But neither in connection with the exhibit of the Langley plane nor
in any report of the Smithsonian Institution was there any hint of
the fundamental changes made at Hammondsport, without which the plane
could not possibly have carried its weight. One of these changes had to
do with the supporting posts on the wings. Professor Langley had not
known--indeed, no one knew until the Wrights’ wind-tunnel experiments
established the facts--where the center of the air pressure would
be on a curved surface, and consequently he had failed to place his
wing-trussing posts where they were most needed. In the attempts to fly
the machine over the Potomac, in 1903, the wing that bore the greater
part of the weight had each time collapsed at the moment the apparatus
left the starting platform. (Lacking the knowledge about curved
surfaces that later was available, those in charge of the 1903 trials
had blamed the trouble on the launching apparatus.) At the Hammondsport
tests, the trussing posts were moved thirty inches rearward. This
brought the guy posts almost exactly in the same plane with the center
of pressure on the wings and thus eliminated the backward pull that had
wrecked the machine in the 1903 tests.
Three fundamental changes were made in the design of the wings
themselves: (1) The camber was greatly changed; (2) the shape of the
leading edge was entirely different; (3) the aspect ratio--the ratio
of span to chord--was increased. These three features are the most
important characteristics in determining the efficiency of a wing.
The change of the camber of itself may increase the efficiency of a
wing by thirty per cent. And not only were the wings changed as to
design, but they were strengthened by various means of reinforcing and
trussing not used by Langley. Even the cloth on the wings was improved
by varnishing, to make the wings more efficient. Langley had not used
varnish on the cloth.
Numerous changes were made in other parts of the machine. The large
fixed vertical keel surface, situated below the main frame in 1903,
was entirely omitted in 1914. This omission improved the machine’s
stability. A different kind of rudder was used. The position of the
“Pénaud tail” used by Langley was raised about ten inches to increase
the stability of the machine, and was connected to a modern steering
post, to give better control. The forward corners of the original
Langley propellers were cut off in the manner of the early Wright
propellers to increase their efficiency. As the system of control
Langley had used was not adequate, the aileron system, covered by
Wright patents, a system unknown to Langley, was added.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account