Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
7. But even holy Scripture does not appear to me to be altogether silent
on the nature of this secret, as when the Apostle Paul, in discussing
the case of Jacob and Esau, says: “For the children being not yet born,
neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according
to election might stand, not of works, but of Him who calleth, it was
said, The elder shall serve the younger, as it is written, Jacob have I
loved, but Esau have I hated.”[312] And after that, he answers himself,
and says, “What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God?”
And that he might furnish us with an opportunity of inquiring into these
matters, and of ascertaining how these things do not happen without a
reason, he answers himself, and says, “God forbid.”[313] For the same
question, as it seems to me, which is raised concerning Jacob and Esau,
may be raised regarding all celestial and terrestrial creatures, and
even those of the lower world as well. And in like manner it seems to
me, that as he there says, “The children being not yet born, neither
having done any good or evil,” so it might also be said of all other
things, “When they were not yet” created, “neither had yet done any good
or evil, that the decree of God according to election may stand,” that
(as certain think) some things on the one hand were created heavenly,
some on the other earthly, and others, again, beneath the earth, “not of
works” (as they think), “but of Him who calleth,” what shall we say
then, if these things are so? “Is there unrighteousness with God? God
forbid.” As, therefore, when the Scriptures are carefully examined
regarding Jacob and Esau, it is not found to be unrighteousness with God
that it should be said, before they were born, or had done anything in
this life, “the elder shall serve the younger;” and as it is found not
to be unrighteousness that even in the womb Jacob supplanted his
brother, if we feel that he was worthily beloved by God, according to
the deserts of his previous life, so as to deserve to be preferred
before his brother; so also is it with regard to heavenly creatures, if
we notice that diversity was not the original condition of the creature,
but that, owing to causes that have previously existed, a different
office is prepared by the Creator for each one in proportion to the
degree of his merit, on this ground, indeed, that each one, in respect
of having been created by God an understanding, or a rational spirit,
has, according to the movements of his mind and the feelings of his
soul, gained for himself a greater or less amount of merit, and has
become either an object of love to God, or else one of dislike to Him;
while, nevertheless, some of those who are possessed of greater merit
are ordained to suffer with others for the adorning of the state of the
world, and for the discharge of duty to creatures of a lower grade, in
order that by this means they themselves may be participators in the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account