Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
1. But since the discourse has reminded us of the subjects of a future
judgment and of retribution, and of the punishments of sinners,
according to the threatenings of holy Scripture and the contents of the
church’s teaching—viz., that when the time of judgment comes,
everlasting fire, and outer darkness, and a prison, and a furnace, and
other punishments of like nature, have been prepared for sinners—let us
see what our opinions on these points ought to be. But that these
subjects may be arrived at in proper order, it seems to me that we ought
first to consider the nature of the resurrection, that we may know what
that [body] is which shall come either to punishment, or to rest, or to
happiness; which question in other treatises which we have composed
regarding the resurrection we have discussed at greater length, and have
shown what our opinions were regarding it. But now, also, for the sake
of logical order in our treatise, there will be no absurdity in
re-stating a few points from such works, especially since some take
offence at the creed of the church, as if our belief in the resurrection
were foolish, and altogether devoid of sense; and these are principally
heretics, who, I think, are to be answered in the following manner. If
they also admit that there is a resurrection of the dead, let them
answer us this, What is that which died? Was it not a body? It is of the
body, then, that there will be a resurrection. Let them next tell us if
they think that we are to make use of bodies or not. I think that when
the Apostle Paul says, that “it is sown a natural body, it will arise a
spiritual body,”[317] they cannot deny that it is a body which arises,
or that in the resurrection we are to make use of bodies. What then? If
it is certain that we are to make use of bodies, and if the bodies which
have fallen are declared to rise again (for only that which before has
fallen can be properly said to rise again), it can be a matter of doubt
to no one that they rise again, in order that we may be clothed with
them a second time at the resurrection. The one thing is closely
connected with the other. For if bodies rise again, they undoubtedly
rise to be coverings for us; and if it is necessary for us to be
invested with bodies, as it is certainly necessary, we ought to be
invested with no other than our own. But if it is true that these rise
again, and that they arise “spiritual” bodies, there can be no doubt
that they are said to rise from the dead, after casting away corruption
and laying aside mortality; otherwise it will appear vain and
superfluous for any one to arise from the dead in order to die a second
time. And this, finally, may be more distinctly comprehended thus, if
one carefully consider what are the qualities of an animal body, which,
when sown into the earth, recovers the qualities of a spiritual body.
For it is out of the animal body that the very power and grace of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account