Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Reader, remember me in your prayers, that we too may deserve to be made
emulators of the spirit. The two former books on _The Principles_ I
translated not only at your instance, but even under pressure from you
during the days of Lent;[348] but as you, my devout brother Macarius,
were not only living near me during that time, but had more leisure at
your command than now, so I also worked the harder; whereas I have been
longer in explaining these two latter books, seeing you came less
frequently from a distant extremity of the city to urge on my labour.
Now if you remember what I warned you of in my former preface,—that
certain persons would be indignant, if they did not hear that we spoke
some evil of Origen,—that, I imagine, you have forthwith experienced,
has come to pass. But if those demons[349] who excite the tongues of men
to slander were so infuriated by that work, in which he had not as yet
fully unveiled their secret proceedings, what, think you, will be the
case in this, in which he will expose all those dark and hidden ways, by
which they creep into the hearts of men, and deceive weak and unstable
souls? You will immediately see all things thrown into confusion,
seditions stirred up, clamours raised throughout the whole city, and
that individual summoned to receive sentence of condemnation who
endeavoured to dispel the diabolical darkness of ignorance by means of
the light of the gospel lamp.[350] Let such things, however, be lightly
esteemed by him who is desirous of being trained in divine learning,
while retaining in its integrity the rule of the Catholic faith.[351] I
think it necessary, however, to remind you that the principle observed
in the former books has been observed also in these, viz. not to
translate what appeared contrary to Origen’s other opinions, and to our
own belief, but to pass by such passages as being interpolated and
forged by others. But if he has appeared to give expression to any
novelties regarding rational creatures (on which subject the essence of
our faith does not depend), for the sake of discussion and of adding to
our knowledge, when perhaps it was necessary for us to answer in such an
order some heretical opinions, I have not omitted to mention these
either in the present or preceding books, unless when he wished to
repeat in the following books what he had already stated in the previous
ones, when I have thought it convenient, for the sake of brevity, to
curtail some of these repetitions. Should any one, however, peruse these
passages from a desire to enlarge his knowledge, and not to raise
captious objections, he will do better to have them expounded by persons
of skill. For it is an absurdity to have the fictions of poetry and the
ridiculous plays of comedy[352] interpreted by grammarians, and to
suppose that without a master and an interpreter any one is able to
learn those things which are spoken either of God or of the heavenly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account