Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
and that the running of those who are, as it were, athletes, does not
enable them to gain the prize of the high calling of God in Christ
Jesus—for these things are accomplished with the assistance of God—it is
well said that “it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth,
but of God that showeth mercy.” As if also it were said with regard to
husbandry what also is actually recorded: “I planted, Apollos watered;
and God gave the increase. So then neither is he that planteth anything,
neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.”[547] Now we
could not piously assert that the production of full crops was the work
of the husbandman, or of him that watered, but the work of God. So also
our own perfection is brought about, not as if we ourselves did
nothing;[548] for it is not completed[549] by us, but God produces the
greater part of it. And that this assertion may be more clearly
believed, we shall take an illustration from the art of navigation. For
in comparison with the effect of the winds,[550] and the mildness of the
air,[551] and the light of the stars, all co-operating in the
preservation of the crew, what proportion[552] could the art of
navigation be said to bear in the bringing of the ship into
harbour?—since even the sailors themselves, from piety, do not venture
to assert often that they had saved the ship, but refer all to God; not
as if they had done nothing, but because what had been done by
Providence was infinitely[553] greater than what had been effected by
their art. And in the matter of our salvation, what is done by God is
infinitely greater than what is done by ourselves; and therefore, I
think, is it said that “it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that
runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.” For if in the manner which they
imagine we must explain the statement,[554] that “it is not of him that
willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy,” the
commandments are superfluous; and it is in vain that Paul himself blames
some for having fallen away, and approves of others as having remained
upright, and enacts laws for the churches: it is in vain also that we
give ourselves up to desire better things, and in vain also [to attempt]
to run. But it is not in vain that Paul gives such advice, censuring
some and approving of others; nor in vain that we give ourselves up to
the desire of better things, and to the chase after things that are
pre-eminent. They have accordingly not well explained the meaning of the
passage.[555]
FROM THE LATIN.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account