Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Saviour were instructed in something higher than the knowledge of
Solomon. For if one were to assert that the Saviour did indeed Himself
possess greater knowledge, but did not communicate more to others than
Solomon did, how will that agree with the statement which follows: “The
queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment, and condemn the men of
this generation, because she came from the ends of the earth to hear the
wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here?”[667]
There is therefore a wisdom of this world, and also probably a wisdom
belonging to each individual prince of this world. But with respect to
the wisdom of God alone, we perceive that this is indicated, that it
operated to a less degree in ancient and former times, and was
[afterwards] more fully revealed and manifested through Christ. We shall
inquire, however, regarding the wisdom of God in the proper place.
2. But now, since we are treating of the manner in which the opposing
powers stir up those contests, by means of which false knowledge is
introduced into the minds of men, and human souls led astray, while they
imagine that they have discovered wisdom, I think it necessary to name
and distinguish the wisdom of this world, and of the princes of this
world, that by so doing we may discover who are the fathers of this
wisdom, nay, even of these kinds of wisdom.[668] I am of opinion,
therefore, as I have stated above, that there is another wisdom of this
world besides those [different kinds of] wisdom[669] which belong to the
princes of this world, by which wisdom those things seem to be
understood and comprehended which belong to this world. This wisdom,
however, possesses in itself no fitness for forming any opinion either
respecting divine things,[670] or the plan of the world’s government, or
any other subjects of importance, or regarding the training for a good
or happy life; but is such as deals wholly with the art of poetry,
_e.g._, or that of grammar, or rhetoric, or geometry, or music, with
which also, perhaps, medicine should be classed. In all these subjects
we are to suppose that the wisdom of this world is included. The wisdom
of the princes of this world, on the other hand, we understand to be
such as the secret and occult philosophy, as they call it, of the
Egyptians, and the astrology of the Chaldeans and Indians, who make
profession of the knowledge of high things,[671] and also that manifold
variety of opinion which prevails among the Greeks regarding divine
things. Accordingly, in the holy Scriptures we find that there are
princes over individual nations; as in Daniel[672] we read that there
was a prince of the kingdom of Persia, and another prince of the kingdom
of Græcia, who are clearly shown, by the nature of the passage, to be
not human beings, but certain powers. In the prophecies of Ezekiel,[673]
also, the prince of Tyre is unmistakeably shown to be a kind of
spiritual power. When these, then, and others of the same kind,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account