Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
down from the Lord upon the gates of Jerusalem;”[867] and, “An evil
spirit from the Lord plagued Saul;”[868] and countless other passages
like these—they have not ventured to disbelieve these as the Scriptures
of God; but believing them to be the [words] of the Demiurge, whom the
Jews worship, they thought that as the Demiurge was an imperfect and
unbenevolent God, the Saviour had come to announce a more perfect Deity,
who, they say, is not the Demiurge, being of different opinions
regarding Him; and having once departed from the Demiurge, who is the
only uncreated God, they have given themselves up to fictions, inventing
to themselves hypotheses, according to which they imagine that there are
some things which are visible, and certain other things which are not
visible, all which are the fancies of their own minds. And yet, indeed,
the more simple among those who profess to belong to the church have
supposed that there is no deity greater than the Demiurge, being right
in so thinking, while they imagine regarding Him such things as would
not be believed of the most savage and unjust of mankind.
FROM THE LATIN.
9. Now the reason of the erroneous apprehension of all these points on
the part of those whom we have mentioned above, is no other than this,
that holy Scripture is not understood by them according to its
spiritual, but according to its literal meaning. And therefore we shall
endeavour, so far as our moderate capacity will permit, to point out to
those who believe the holy Scriptures to be no human compositions, but
to be written by inspiration of the Holy Spirit, and to be transmitted
and entrusted to us by the will of God the Father, through His
only-begotten Son Jesus Christ, what appears to us, who observe things
by a right way of understanding,[869] to be the standard and discipline
delivered to the apostles by Jesus Christ, and which they handed down in
succession to their posterity, the teachers of the holy church. Now,
that there are certain mystical economies[870] indicated in holy
Scripture, is admitted by all, I think, even the simplest of believers.
But what these are, or of what kind they are, he who is rightly minded,
and not overcome with the vice of boasting, will scrupulously[871]
acknowledge himself to be ignorant. For if any one, _e.g._, were to
adduce the case of the daughters of Lot, who seem, contrary to the law
of God,[872] to have had intercourse with their father, or that of the
two wives of Abraham, or of the two sisters who were married to Jacob,
or of the two handmaids who increased the number of his sons, what other
answer could be returned than that these were certain mysteries,[873]
and forms of spiritual things, but that we are ignorant of what nature
they are? Nay, even when we read of the construction of the tabernacle,
we deem it certain that the written descriptions are the figures of
certain hidden things; but to adapt these to their appropriate
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account