Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
17. In the passages containing the commandments also, similar things are
found. For in the law Moses is commanded to destroy every male that is
not circumcised on the eighth day, which is exceedingly
incongruous,[940] since it would be necessary, if it were related that
the law was executed according to the history, to command those parents
to be punished who did not circumcise their children, and also those who
were the nurses of little children. The declaration of Scripture now is,
“The uncircumcised male, _i.e._ who shall not have been circumcised,
shall be cut off from his people.”[941] And if we are to inquire
regarding the impossibilities of the law, we find an animal called the
goat-stag,[942] which cannot possibly exist, but which, as being in the
number of clean beasts, Moses commands to be eaten; and a griffin,[943]
which no one ever remembers or heard of as yielding to human power, but
which the legislator forbids to be used for food. Respecting the
celebrated[944] observance of the Sabbath also he thus speaks: “Ye shall
sit, every one in your dwellings; no one shall move from his place on
the Sabbath-day.”[945] Which precept it is impossible to observe
literally; for no man can sit a whole day so as not to move from the
place where he sat down. With respect to each one of these points now,
those who belong to the circumcision, and all who would have no more
meaning to be found in sacred Scripture than what is indicated by the
letter, consider that there should be no investigation regarding the
goat-stag, and the griffin, and the vulture; and they invent some empty
and trifling tales about the Sabbath, drawn from some traditional
sources or other, alleging that every one’s place is computed to him
within two thousand cubits.[946] Others, again, among whom is Dositheus
the Samaritan, censure indeed expositions of this kind, but themselves
lay down something more ridiculous, viz. that each one must remain until
the evening in the posture, place, or position in which he found himself
on the Sabbath-day; _i.e._ if found sitting, he is to sit the whole day,
or if reclining, he is to recline the whole day. Moreover, the
injunction which runs, “Bear no burden on the Sabbath-day,”[947] seems
to me an impossibility. For the Jewish doctors, in consequence of these
[prescriptions], have betaken themselves, as the holy apostle says, to
innumerable fables, saying that it is not accounted a burden if a man
wear shoes without nails, but that it is a burden if shoes with nails be
worn; and that if it be carried on one shoulder, they consider it a
burden; but if on both, they declare it to be none.
FROM THE GREEK.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account