Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
2. Now, when it is said that all things were made by Him, and that in
Him were all things created, both things in heaven and things on earth,
there can be no doubt that also those things which are in the firmament,
which is called heaven, and in which those luminaries are said to be
placed, are included amongst the number of heavenly things. And
secondly, seeing that the course of the discussion has manifestly
discovered that all things were made or created, and that amongst
created things there is nothing which may not admit of good and evil,
and be capable of either, what are we to think of the following opinion
which certain of our friends entertain regarding sun, moon, and stars,
viz. that they are unchangeable, and incapable of becoming the opposite
of what they are? Not a few have held that view even regarding the holy
angels, and certain heretics also regarding souls, which they call
spiritual natures.
In the first place, then, let us see what reason itself can discover
respecting sun, moon, and stars,—whether the opinion, entertained by
some, of their unchangeableness be correct,—and let the declarations of
holy Scripture, as far as possible, be first adduced. For Job appears to
assert that not only may the stars be subject to sin, but even that they
are actually not clean from the contagion of it. The following are his
words: “The stars also are not clean in Thy sight.”[132] Nor is this to
be understood of the splendour of their physical substance, as if one
were to say, for example, of a garment, that it is not clean; for if
such were the meaning, then the accusation of a want of cleanness in the
splendour of their bodily substance would imply an injurious reflection
upon their Creator. For if they are unable, through their own diligent
efforts, either to acquire for themselves a body of greater brightness,
or through their sloth to make the one they have less pure, how should
they incur censure for being stars that are not clean, if they receive
no praise because they are so?
3. But to arrive at a clearer understanding on these matters, we ought
first to inquire after this point, whether it is allowable to suppose
that they are living and rational beings; then, in the next place,
whether their souls came into existence at the same time with their
bodies, or seem to be anterior to them; and also whether, after the end
of the world, we are to understand that they are to be released from
their bodies; and whether, as we cease to live, so they also will cease
from illuminating the world. Although this inquiry may seem to be
somewhat bold, yet, as we are incited by the desire of ascertaining the
truth as far as possible, there seems no absurdity in attempting an
investigation of the subject agreeably to the grace of the Holy Spirit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account