Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
before his birth? Some, perhaps, may think that God fills individuals
with His Holy Spirit, and bestows upon them sanctification, not on
grounds of justice and according to their deserts, but undeservedly. And
how shall we escape that declaration: “Is there unrighteousness with
God? God forbid!”[136] or this: “Is there respect of persons with
God?”[137] For such is the defence of those who maintain that souls come
into existence with bodies. So far, then, as we can form an opinion from
a comparison with the condition of man, I think it follows that we must
hold the same to hold good with heavenly beings, which reason itself and
scriptural authority show us to be the case with men.
5. But let us see whether we can find in holy Scripture any indications
properly applicable to these heavenly existences. The following is the
statement of the Apostle Paul: “The creature was made subject to vanity,
not willingly, but by reason of Him who subjected the same in hope,
because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of
corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.”[138] To
what vanity, pray, was the creature made subject, or what creature is
referred to, or how is it said “not willingly,” or “in hope of what?”
And in what way is the creature itself to be delivered from the bondage
of corruption? Elsewhere, also, the same apostle says: “For the
expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of
God.”[139] And again in another passage, “And not only we, but the
creation itself groaneth together, and is in pain until now.”[140] And
hence we have to inquire what are the groanings, and what are the pains.
Let us see then, in the first place, what is the vanity to which the
creature is subject. I apprehend that it is nothing else than the body;
for although the body of the stars is ethereal, it is nevertheless
material. Whence also Solomon appears to characterize the whole of
corporeal nature as a kind of burden which enfeebles the vigour of the
soul in the following language: “Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher;
all is vanity. I have looked, and seen all the works that are done under
the sun; and, behold, all is vanity.”[141] To this vanity, then, is the
creature subject, that creature especially which, being assuredly the
greatest in this world, holds also a distinguished principality of
labour, _i.e._ the sun, and moon, and stars, are said to be subject to
vanity, because they are clothed with bodies, and set apart to the
office of giving light to the human race. “And this creature,” he
remarks, “was subjected to vanity not willingly.” For it did not
undertake a voluntary service to vanity, but because it was the will of
Him who made it subject, and because of the promise of the Subjector to
those who were reduced to this unwilling obedience, that when the
ministry of their great work was performed, they were to be freed from
this bondage of corruption and vanity when the time of the glorious
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account