Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
After the above statements, he continues: “If he wished to remain hid,
why was there heard a voice from heaven proclaiming him to be the Son of
God? And if he did not seek to remain concealed, why was he punished? or
why did he die?” Now, by such questions he thinks to convict the
histories of discrepancy, not observing that Jesus neither desired all
things regarding Himself to be known to all whom He happened to meet,
nor yet all things to be unknown. Accordingly, the voice from heaven
which proclaimed Him to be the Son of God, in the words, “This is my
beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased,”[218] is not stated to have been
audible to the multitudes, as this Jew of Celsus supposed. The voice
from the cloud on the high mountain, moreover, was heard only by those
who had gone up with Him. For the divine voice is of such a nature, as
to be heard only by those whom the speaker wishes to hear it. And I
maintain, that the voice of God which is referred to, is neither air
which has been struck, nor any concussion of the air, nor anything else
which is mentioned in treatises on the voice;[219] and therefore it is
heard by a better and more divine organ of hearing than that of sense.
And when the speaker will not have his voice to be heard by all, he that
has the finer ear hears the voice of God, while he who has the ears of
his soul deadened does not perceive that it is God who speaks. These
things I have mentioned because of his asking, “Why was there heard a
voice from heaven proclaiming him to be the Son of God?” while with
respect to the query, “Why was he punished, if he wished to remain hid?”
what has been stated at greater length in the preceding pages on the
subject of His sufferings may suffice.
Footnote 218:
Matt. iii. 17.
Footnote 219:
οὐδέπω δὲ λέγω, ὅτι οὐ πάντως ἐστὶν ἀὴρ πεπληγμένος, ἤ πληγὴ ἀέρος, ἤ
ὅτι ποτὲ λέγεται ἐν τοῖς περί φωνης.
Chapter LXXIII.
The Jew proceeds, after this, to state as a consequence what does not
follow from the premises; for it does _not_ follow from “His having
wished, by the punishments which He underwent, to teach us also to
despise death,” that after His resurrection He should openly summon all
men to the light, and instruct them in the object of His coming. For He
had formerly summoned all men to the light in the words, “Come unto me,
all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.”[220]
And the object of His coming had been explained at great length in His
discourses on the beatitudes, and in the announcements which followed
them, and in the parables, and in His conversations with the scribes and
Pharisees. And the instruction afforded us by the Gospel of John, shows
that the eloquence of Jesus consisted not in words, but in deeds; while
it is manifest from the Gospel narratives that His speech was “with
power,” on which account also they marvelled at Him.
Footnote 220:
Cf. Matt. xi. 28.
Chapter LXXIV.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account