Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Nay, if the Jew perceive the meaning of the prophetic Scriptures,
he will be able to show that it is for no light reason that God employs
threatenings and revilings, when He says, “Woe unto you,” and “I tell
you beforehand.” And how should God employ such expressions for the
conversion of men, which Celsus thinks that even a prudent man would not
have recourse to? But Christians, who know only one God—the same who
spoke in the prophets and in the Lord [Jesus]—can prove the
reasonableness of those threatenings and revilings, as Celsus considers
and entitles them. And here a few remarks shall be addressed to this
Celsus, who professes both to be a philosopher, and to be acquainted
with all our system. How is it, friend, when Hermes, in Homer, says to
Odysseus,
“Why, now, wretched man, do you come wandering alone over the
mountain-tops?”[235]
that you are satisfied with the answer, which explains that the Homeric
Hermes addresses such language to Odysseus to remind him of his
duty,[236] because it is characteristic of the Sirens to flatter and to
say pleasing things, around whom
“Is a huge heap of bones,”[237]
and who say,
“Come hither, much lauded Odysseus, great glory of the Greeks;”[238]
whereas, if our prophets and Jesus Himself, in order to turn their
hearers from evil, make use of such expressions as “Woe unto you,” and
what you regard as revilings, there is no condescension in such language
to the circumstances of the hearers, nor any application of such words
to them as healing[239] medicine? Unless, indeed, you would have God, or
one who partakes of the divine nature, when conversing with men, to have
regard to His own nature alone, and to what is worthy of Himself, but to
have no regard to what is fitting to be brought before men who are under
the dispensation and leading of His word, and with each one of whom He
is to converse agreeably to his individual character. And is it not a
ridiculous assertion regarding Jesus, to say that He was unable to
persuade men, when you compare the state of matters not only among the
Jews, who have many such instances recorded in the prophecies, but also
among the Greeks, among whom all of those who have attained great
reputation for their wisdom have been unable to persuade those who
conspired against them, or to induce their judges or accusers to cease
from evil, and to endeavour to attain to virtue by the way of
philosophy?
Footnote 227:
Isa. v. 8.
Footnote 228:
Isa. v. 11.
Footnote 229:
Isa. v. 18.
Footnote 230:
Isa. v. 20.
Footnote 231:
Isa. v. 22.
Footnote 232:
Cf. Isa. i. 4.
Footnote 233:
Isa. i. 7.
Footnote 234:
Ezek. ii. 6.
Footnote 235:
Cf. _Odyss._ x. 281.
Footnote 236:
ὑπὲρ ἐπιστροφῆς.
Footnote 237:
Cf. _Odyss._ xii. 45.
Footnote 238:
_Ibid._ xii. 184.
Footnote 239:
παιώνιον φαρμάκον.
Chapter LXXVII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account