Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
And if the above be the state of the case, how do Jews and Christians
search after “the shadow of an ass,” in seeking to ascertain from those
prophecies which they believe in common, whether He who was foretold has
come, or has not yet arrived, and is still an object of expectation? But
even suppose[261] it be granted to Celsus that it was not Jesus who was
announced by the prophets, then, even on such a hypothesis, the
investigation of the sense of the prophetic writings is no search after
“the shadow of an ass,” if he who was spoken of can be clearly pointed
out, and it can be shown both what sort of person he was predicted to
be, and what he was to do, and, if possible, when he was to arrive. But
in the preceding pages we have already spoken on the point of Jesus
being the individual who was foretold to be the Christ, quoting a few
prophecies out of a larger number. Neither Jews nor Christians, then,
are wrong in assuming that the prophets spoke under divine
influence;[262] but they are in error who form erroneous opinions
respecting Him who was expected by the prophets to come, and whose
person and character were made known in their “true discourses.”
Footnote 261:
καθ’ ὑπόθεσιν.
Footnote 262:
θεόθεν.
Chapter V.
Immediately after these points, Celsus, imagining that the Jews are
Egyptians by descent, and had abandoned Egypt, after revolting against
the Egyptian state, and despising the customs of that people in matters
of worship, says that “they suffered from the adherents of Jesus, who
believed in Him as the Christ, the same treatment which they had
inflicted upon the Egyptians; and that the cause which led to the new
state of things[263] in either instance was rebellion against the
state.” Now let us observe what Celsus has here done. The ancient
Egyptians, after inflicting many cruelties upon the Hebrew race, who had
settled in Egypt owing to a famine which had broken out in Judea,
suffered, in consequence of their injustice to strangers and suppliants,
that punishment which divine Providence had decreed was to fall on the
whole nation for having combined against an entire people, who had been
their guests, and who had done them no harm; and after being smitten by
plagues from God, they allowed them, with difficulty, and after a brief
period, to go wherever they liked, as being unjustly detained in
slavery. Because, then, they were a selfish people, who honoured those
who were in any degree related to them far more than they did strangers
of better lives, there is not an accusation which they have omitted to
bring against Moses and the Hebrews,—not altogether denying, indeed, the
miracles and wonders done by him, but alleging that they were wrought by
sorcery, and not by divine power. Moses, however, not as a magician, but
as a devout man, and one devoted to the God of all things, and a
partaker in the divine Spirit, both enacted laws for the Hebrews,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account