Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
That philosophical discourses, however, distinguished by orderly
arrangement and elegant expression,[441] should produce such results in
the case of those individuals just enumerated, and upon others[442] who
have led wicked lives, is not at all to be wondered at. But when we
consider that those discourses, which Celsus terms “vulgar,”[443] are
filled with power, as if they were spells, and see that they at once
convert multitudes from a life of licentiousness to one of extreme
regularity,[444] and from a life of wickedness to a better, and from a
state of cowardice or unmanliness to one of such high-toned courage as
to lead men to despise even death through the piety which shows itself
within them, why should we not justly admire the power which they
contain? For the words of those who at the first assumed the office of
[Christian] ambassadors, and who gave their labours to rear up the
churches of God,—nay, their preaching also,—were accompanied with a
persuasive power, though not like that found among those who profess the
philosophy of Plato, or of any other merely human philosopher, which
possesses no other qualities than those of human nature. But the
demonstration which followed the words of the apostles of Jesus was
given from God, and was accredited[445] by the Spirit and by power. And
therefore _their_ word ran swiftly and speedily, or rather the word of
_God_ through their instrumentality, transformed numbers of persons who
had been sinners both by nature and habit, whom no one could have
reformed by punishment, but who were changed by the word, which moulded
and transformed them according to its pleasure.
Footnote 441:
Ἀλλὰ τὴν μὲν τάξιν καὶ σύνθεσιν καὶ φράσιν τῶν ἀπὸ φιλοσοφίας λόγων.
Footnote 442:
The reading in the text is ἄλλως, for which ἄλλους has been
conjectured by Ruæus and Boherellus, and which has been adopted in the
translation.
Footnote 443:
ἰδιωτικοὺς.
Footnote 444:
εὐσταθέστατον.
Footnote 445:
πιστικὴ ἀπὸ πνεύματος.
Chapter LXIX.
Celsus continues in his usual manner, asserting that “to change a nature
entirely is exceedingly difficult.” We, however, who know of only one
nature in every rational soul, and who maintain that none has been
created evil by the Author of all things, but that many have _become_
wicked through education, and perverse example, and surrounding
influences,[446] so that wickedness has been naturalized[447] in some
individuals, are persuaded that for the word of God to change a nature
in which evil has been naturalized is not only not impossible, but is
even a work of no very great difficulty, if a man only believe that he
must entrust himself to the God of all things, and do everything with a
view to please Him with whom
“Both good and bad are not in the same honour,
Nor do the idle man and he who has laboured much
Perish alike.”[448]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account