Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
I do not know how it is, that after the foolish remarks which he has
made upon the subject which we have just been discussing, he should add
the following, that “God does not desire to make himself known for his
own sake, but because he wishes to bestow upon us the knowledge of
himself for the sake of our salvation, in order that those who accept it
may become virtuous and be saved, while those who do not accept may be
shown to be wicked and be punished.” And yet, after making such a
statement, he raises a new objection, saying: “After so long a period of
time,[497] then, did God now bethink himself of making men live
righteous lives,[498] but neglect to do so before?” To which we answer,
that there never was a time when God did not wish to make men live
righteous lives; but He continually evinced His care for the improvement
of the rational animal,[499] by affording him occasions for the exercise
of virtue. For in every generation the wisdom of God, passing into those
souls which it ascertains to be holy, converts them into friends and
prophets of God. And there may be found in the sacred books [the names
of] those who in each generation were holy, and were recipients of the
Divine Spirit, and who strove to convert their contemporaries so far as
in their power.
Footnote 497:
μετὰ τοσοῦτον αἰῶνα.
Footnote 498:
δικαιῶσαι.
Footnote 499:
τὸ λογικὸν ζῶον.
Chapter VIII.
And it is not matter of surprise that in certain generations there have
existed prophets who, in the reception of divine influence,[500]
surpassed, by means of their stronger and more powerful [religious]
life, other prophets who were their contemporaries, and others also who
lived before and after them. And so it is not at all wonderful that
there should also have been a time when something of surpassing
excellence[501] took up its abode among the human race, and which was
distinguished above all that preceded or even that followed it. But
there is an element of profound mystery in the account of these things,
and one which is incapable of being received by the popular
understanding. And in order that these difficulties should be made to
disappear, and that the objections raised against the advent of Christ
should be answered—viz. that, “after so long a period of time, then, did
God now bethink himself of making men live righteous lives, but neglect
to do so before?”—it is necessary to touch upon the narrative of the
divisions [of the nations], and to make it evident why it was, that
“when the Most High divided the nations, when He separated the sons of
Adam, He set the bounds of the nations according to the number of the
angels of God, and the portion of the Lord was His people Jacob, Israel
the cord of His inheritance;”[502] and it will be necessary to state the
reason why the birth of each man took place within each particular
boundary, under him who obtained the boundary by lot, and how it rightly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account